How will the WT "officially" respond to the Heichel case?

by sir82 26 Replies latest jw friends

  • sir82
    sir82

    The case is garnering national attention. It's pretty evident that both murderer and victim were JWs, most likely in "good standing". The JW angle is playing more prominently as details unfold

    The facebook page dedicated to the vctim is getting thousands of hits.

    Will the WT say anything?

    My prediction:

    I expect, sometime this week, a sanctimonious press release from the WT PR department condemning the actions of "former member" Holt for the murder of Whitney Heichel. It will talk about how "we view life as precious, just as Jehovah does" and "we abhor murder" and "the actions of a former member in no way reflect the condition of those in the congregations."

    By the way, Holt will be a "former member" just as soon as the local CO and 2 top-dog local elders get together to pronounce him guilty and DF'ed, if such a meeting has not already happened. The "judicial committee" will take no longer than 5 minutes.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    Maybe they will have to say something, but my guess is that they will try to just stonewall this and say nothing.

  • breakfast of champions
    breakfast of champions

    Not neccesarily so on the auto-DF.

  • sir82
    sir82

    They did it that way for the pedophile Bethelite who was arrested in a "sting" operation in a Chicago airport looking for his prey about 4 or 5 years ago. Forgot his name, but it was all over JWN at the time.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    With the fairly rapid arrest, a confession (and likely an insanity defense; thus no trial) - plus the election news for the next two weeks - this will likely fade fairly fast from the national news picture.

    We, of course, pay much more attention to it becuase of our JW connections.

    The WTBTS nationally will, I think, conclude that not many people will see or remember it very long and just try to keep it out of the news as much as possible by saying nothing.

    Locally, it may last a while longer - a memorial service, and so on.

    But it will fade away soon enough and only a few of us will remember.

  • blondie
    blondie

    How did they respond to the Longo and Bryant stories or the Slack family that beat their daughter to death?

    http://murderpedia.org/male.B/b/bryant-robert.htm

    http://murderpedia.org/male.L/l/longo-christian.htm

    ILLINOIS v. LAWRENCE SLACK and ILLINOIS v. CONSTANCE SLACK were two 2006 Illinois criminal court cases which involved a homeschooling family of African-American Jehovah's Witnesses who lived in Chicago, Illinois. Larry Slack and his wife, Constance Slack, homeschooled their six children, despite the fact that Larry was a fulltime mechanic at the Chicago Transit Authority, and Constance was a fulltime Registered Nurse at La Rabida Children's Hospital.

    Cook County Judge Sumner lamented, "Of the cases I have presided over myself or seen go through this building, this situation, bar none, is the worst I have ever seen or heard." The two Jehovah's Witness Parents were convicted of the beating death of their 12 year-old daughter, Laree Slack, and the beating of their 6 year-old son, in November 2001. Judge Sumner stated that Laree Slack suffered more torture than many prisoners of war who undergo human rights violations. Larry Slack was convicted of committing aggravated battery on his 6 year-old son, and first degree murder of Laree Slack. Larry Slack was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Constance Slack, who cut a deal with prosecutors to testify against her husband, pleaded guilty to murder, but received only a 25 year sentence.

    Typical of parents who are Jehovah's Witnesses and/or homeschoolers, Larry and Constance Slack were strict disciplinarians. Each of their six children, who in November 2001, ranged in age from 6 to 16, were assigned various chores and responsibilities in the Slack household. Given that both parents worked fulltime jobs in the Chicago area, these children must have also been responsible for their own homeschool education.

    On Saturday night, November 10, 2001, Larry and Constance had been planning to go out to eat, but Constance could not find her wallet and credit cards, which she believed to be in one of her jackets or work smocks. Larry ordered all six children to search for them. Dissatisfied that the 6 year-old son was not looking hard enough, Larry Slack lashed the child several times with a thick Romex electrical cable, which the Slacks regularly used to discipline their children. When Constance's wallet and credit cards continued to go un-found, the parents became enraged over finding some laundry scattered about the house. Twelve year-old, Laree Slack, was in charge of washing and putting away the family's clothing, so Constance Slack's lost items were blamed on Laree.

    The 41 year-old, 400+ pound, Larry Slack then began to beat Laree with the Romex electrical cable, in sessions of 39-blows, for what eventually amounted to nearly two hours of beating. At first, Larry bent his 12 year-old daughter over a large metal toolbox. When Laree would not hold still during her beating, Larry ordered his two older teenaged boys to tie her face down onto a metal bedframe, where Larry continued the lashing. When Laree began to scream, Constance first stuck a sock in her mouth. When Laree eventually spit out the sock, Larry ordered his sons to fetch a towel to stuff in her mouth. He then tied a scarf over the towel and used a stick to wind the scarf like a tourniquet. Lalece Slack, then 13, testified at the murder trial that she went to the basement of her family's home and turned on the washer and dryer to drown out the sounds of her sister being beaten upstairs.

    The full details of what occurred during those two hours of torture are blurred. Both Larry and Constance took turns beating the child with electrical cables that may have varied in thickness. At some point, exhausted from delivering the dozens of blows, Larry even took a break to watch television. In what seems to indicate that something even more disgusting may have been going on in this Jehovah's Witness household, at some point, Larry ordered the two teenaged sons to pull off her pants. At some point, Larry also cut off his daugher's shirt. Larry repeatedly ordered the teenaged boys to flip Laree over from side to the other for her next session of 39-blows. The flailing mostly naked girl was beaten bloody on her back, chest, stomach, and legs. When the beating finally stopped, Larry ordered the boys to carry Laree down to the basement and place her on an old mattress, where she eventually died of internal bleeding.

    The Slacks told police that they had meted out the "biblical punishment" of "40 lashes minus one" only three times. At trial, Larry Slack denied intending to harm Laree - only discipline her. Larry even testified that Laree smiled at him and spoke with him after the beating. However, a Medical Examiner testified that Laree had actually been hit "hundreds" of times. Various neighbors described Larry and Constance Slack as "devout Jehovah's Witnesses", who occasionally had attempted to convert them to their WatchTower religion. A reporter who went to view the Slack's residence after the tragedy reported that he found WatchTower and homeschooling publications scattered on an exterior staircase.

    http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com/familicide.html

  • Theocratic Sedition
    Theocratic Sedition

    I don't think they're going to address it. In due time this case will disappear just like all the other crimes of demented passion.

    What I'm really curious about is how the WT will address the outpouring of support from "worldly" people to the families involved. I imagine most of the nonJWs showing support towards the families involved are completely obvlivious to the JW belief which the families of the victims also believe, that all nonJWs will be destroyed in the very near future. These worldy people showing good nature towards JWs throws a monkey wrench into mindset of JWs that believe all nonJWs are deserving of everlasting destruction. If I just lost my sister, daughter, wife because of a fellow brother in the faith, and then recieved emotional and financial support from the very people I look forward to being destroyed someday, that would really mess with my belief system. I wonder if the WT will address that end of this tragedy.

  • sir82
    sir82

    They didn't respond to the Bryant and Longo stories at all....but those did not garner nationwide headlines, and they occurred long before Social Media had the influence it does now.

    Plus, in an indictment of the US media, the victim in the current case was young, white, female, and cute - leading to the increased media coverage.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Did they respond to the one about the sister who was killed and disembowled to get her baby by a woman who came to "buy" a car? She was cute and white enough.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95461&page=1

    “In a sinful world where people have a choice to follow their own sinful and sometimes sickening ways, tragedy will sometimes result,” Dave Iannelli, a Jehovah’s Witnesses religious leader from New York, told mourners at Sunday’s memorial service. “Jehovah is not to blame when bad things happen to good people.”

    http://articles.nydailynews.com/2000-10-05/news/18161729_1_michelle-bica-baby-boy-theresa-andrews

  • undercover
    undercover

    I agree with James.... I think, for now at least, they'll just stonewall the whole thing.

    They'll eventually DF Holt, but only after the publicity has died down and the news of his being excommunicated from the church that Whitney went to won't be newsworthy enough to follow by most media sources.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit