Let's say there is a new law.
Once each year the leader(s) of any religious group have to answer 20 questions in public on TV posed by their critics.
Twenty questions are allowed for a one hour presentation.
Of course, we would expect softball answers. Except for one thing: the questioner can press a "Bullshit" button!
That would mean the question is repeated and another answer was called for. And so on until the questioner was satisfied no dodging or spinning was going on.
So, that is the premise.
What we need now are those 20 questions.
Can we come up with some short and snappy ones?
Remember, we already know the Watchtower President is full of it. No surprises there.
What we would go for is the kind of question that couldn't be squirmed out of.
Additionally, the viewing audience would have to be able to understand what was actually being said.
No inside 607 b.c. question would survive. It would eat up the hour easily!
I think we could come up with some common sense queries.
Put them on the spot and face them with a fact that cannot be dodged.
You don't have to create all twenty of them, certainly.
But, just one good one each.
Then, the rest of the group can vote for the BEST 20 of all the extra ones given.
After that, you may suggest who would be the best candidate (here on JW-net) to be the interrogator.
My question suggestion is as follows:
If we divide human ideas and human ingenuity one side from Divine ideas and god inspired purpose and intelligence on the other side ...we have every
right to expect the human side would always have errors and need constant revisions. We expect the Divine ideas to be perfect from the outside and never need changing.
QUESTION: Why then has the record and history of Watchtower teaching constantly needed revision to correct errors IF yours is the ONLY true religion derriving its information from no-guesswork because Jehovah is the editor? Isn't a "gradual" learning process a dead giveaway of human thinking and wouldn't NEW LIGHT just be an artificial way of explaining "We Goofed--reset--let's try again"?
My suggestion for questioner: Leoleia