Ah Mav, you old devil, I'm feeding you like a stooge, but to lurkers, you're proving my every point. (That's why I'm feeding the troll, folks)
You see, I, nor my wife, are disfellowshipped. In fact, we're merely inactive.
We committed no sin. The only thing that they know we've done, is not go to meetings.
Their 'brothers' have done some pretty unspeakable things to my wife and I, but because of their personal nature, I can't reveal them on this board.
And who is more important, family, or their friends from the hall?
If you say 'friends from the hall' then you prove my point.
If you say family, then you're proving shunning's unscriptural basis.
You spoke of humility.
Perhaps the humility to accept people without regard to their denomination? I know what witnesses say after they leave the door. I know what kind of filth Witnesses regard the world as.
Humility is a broad word, but in the witness sense, means complete surrender to every conscience stricter than your own. At least the five or six halls I've attended.
Humility doesn't mean shame. It doesn't mean admitting wrong when there was no wrong done. Admitting wrong in that case is a lie.
Our attitude is 'accept us as we are, and we accept you as you are'.
We could easily coexist with them as long as they didn't harass us.
Love is not conditional, nor does it have specific rules. There is a different love language for every relationship. Family is no different.
Her parents' policy is their 'way or no way.' You sound like a parent, so I'll assume you have children in the 'truth'. Are they happy? What trials have you gone through? Are you loving to them? Would you love and accept your children if they dropped out of being witnesses?
Your answers on those points intrigue me.
Also, your last point was about the 'attitude of the repentant sinner'. If the attitude is 'screw my family', or 'i hate my family', then I agree with you.
But if the attitude is, "I have enough self respect to make my own decisions and still accept those of others, whether they be contrary or no," then your point is moot. The blame on an unhappy family goes to the agressor, the person committing the shunning, not the person who sinned.
"How? By spreading lies and going against the brothers that they hold dear?"-MAVMAN
Name one lie. If you can't find one, then your words are slander.
ashi