New Article regarding the Global Flood of Noah

by jwfacts 63 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    I think the other factor that your article brings up is, how did they steer the Ark? Before the 40 days would've been up, the Ark would inevitably have encountered mountain ranges or large rock formations that would endanger it. I would think they would need to have some means of guiding it to keep it from smashing into stuff. Unless we're to assume God did all the steering or something...

    But it is a very good article. The sheer numbers involved on every level are staggering and it's hard to imagine I took it all at face value before...

    --sd-7

  • mP
    mP

    jwfacts:

    Just change your dictionary from Aust English to American English so it doesnt complain where the Americans spell certain words incorrectly eg colour becomes color.

  • mP
    mP

    sd7:

    Before the 40 days would've been up, the Ark would inevitably have encountered mountain ranges or large rock formations that would endanger it.

    mP:

    Genesis says it rained for 150 days and 40 days. Not sure how but both lengths are given.

    Of course dont believe me read for yourself, scriptures below.

    The flood lasted 40 days.The flood lasted 150 days.
    Genesis 7:17
    And the flood was forty days upon the earth.
    Genesis 7:24
    And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.

    Genesis 8:3
    And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the one hundred and fifty days the waters were abated.
  • goatshapeddemon
    goatshapeddemon

    Sending to my bro...

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts

    SD7 I would think they would need to have some means of guiding it to keep it from smashing into stuff. Unless we're to assume God did all the steering or something...

    A JW will assume Jehovah steered it, just as Jehovah shut the door and directed the animals to the ark.

    L P - My advice would be to try and write it like an academic article in that i mean any reasonings or conclusion deduced should be referenced to evidence supporting your claim.

    LP, the article is not aimed at academics, but rather JW's. If JW's were concerned with academic references, they would not be JW's, since little of what is in the Watchtower is ever properly referenced. If you look at the email that I received, you will see the level of reasoning skills of the average JW reader, who dismisses the entire article because it contradicts a JW article, and one that is not even accurate at that. That is why I have tried to make most pf the points simple and logical, where they can be understood without a need of scientific references. That being said, I have referenced most contentious points made in the article, but have noticed at your suggestion that there are a few more that I should add.

    MP - Genesis says it rained for 150 days and 40 days.

    The flood account is generally accepted by scholars to have been redacted from two different flood legends, hence a few areas that it has these apparent contradictions. It is similar with the two different creation accounts in Gensis 1 and 2.

  • l p
    l p

    L P - My advice would be to try and write it like an academic article in that i mean any reasonings or conclusion deduced should be referenced to evidence supporting your claim.

    LP, the article is not aimed at academics, but rather JW's. If JW's were concerned with academic references, they would not be JW's, since little of what is in the Watchtower is ever properly referenced. If you look at the email that I received, you will see the level of reasoning skills of the average JW reader, who dismisses the entire article because it contradicts a JW article, and one that is not even accurate at that. That is why I have tried to make most pf the points simple and logical, where they can be understood without a need of scientific references. That being said, I have referenced most contentious points made in the article, but have noticed at your suggestion that there are a few more that I should add.

    jwfacts: my suggestion only adds to the validity of the article. Not all jws are uneducated. And further my suggestion was not to aim the article at academics or use academic language. One can write a simply logical article in academic style i.e. referenced throughout the article. Doing this adds strength to your article in the scientific community as they can refer to it and it could possibly be recognised. But thats just a suggestion to open up possibilities.

    Lp

  • smiddy
    smiddy

    I was always under the impression that it rained continually for 40 days and nights but the waters didn`t recede until 150 days after the event.

    smiddy

  • l p
    l p

    yes that was my understanding to smiddy

    lp

  • smiddy
    smiddy

    Thank`s for that article Paul , as it highlights the need to analyse what we are told and not accept things in blind faith as many of us once did .

    smiddy

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    Suggestion:

    "Earthquakes are a sign of the last days, yet mModern quakes are almost inconsequential in comparison to what would be required for Everest to form after a flood just 4,400 years ago."

    Why pander??

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit