Page 4, 5, paragraph 3
Here is another tidbit picked up from reading the NICNT-Matthew commentary.
There is a thought presented In the Jeremiah book concerning the character of Jeremiah's message. This is paragraph 3, pages 4, 5 from the Jeremiah book:
You may have noted, though, that some Bible readers tend to view Jeremiah's writings as ‘not for them.' They may imagine that the books of Jeremiah and Lamentations offer only dire warnings and grim predictions. But is that a realistic view of Jeremiah and Lamentations?
The next paragraph goes on to admit that some of Jeremiah's message is frank, but positive overall.
I was reading in the NICNT commentary concerning the account in Matthew 16, where Jesus asks his disciples, "Who are men saying the Son of man is?" The disciples reply, "Some say John the Baptist, others E·li′jah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." (Mt 16:13, 14 NWT)
R. T. France comments on why people would say "Jeremiah, or one of the prophets." That is, why would Jeremiah be singled out over any other prophet? He says:
One surprising element, which is peculiar to Matthew, is the singling out of Jeremiah as a model for understanding Jesus. Jeremiah was, of course, a prominent OT prophet, but why choose him rather than, say, Isaiah, with whom Jesus has himself implicitly compared his own ministry in the quotation in 13:13-15? The answer may be found in the peculiar nature of Jeremiah's message, which has made his name proverbial as a prophet of doom, and in the sustained opposition he encountered among his own people. In particular, Jeremiah incurred fierce hostility by predicting the downfall of Judah and the destruction of the temple, and a similar message will become an increasing feature of Jesus' ministry as Matthew relates it. . . It is not very surprising that some people, whether in admiration or in disparagement, might have seen [Jesus] already as a second Jeremiah; as the story [in Matthew] continues, the identification will become even more apt.
[End of Quote]
Nothing groundshaking here. But an interestingly different take on the view of Jeremiah, both by R. T. France and the Jews of the first century, in comparison with the presentment of Jeremiah in the Society's book.