Oh dear smiddy, I was told to do this months ago - and have done so at least three times, each time with no answer. What on earth is so difficult about being prepared to answer very simple questions to explain what is meant by "unprecedented" and "vicious" acts of persecution?
For goodness sake, if Mr Unthank is prepared to let others such as Barbara Anderson dessiminate his verbatim condemnatory reports, why cannot he flesh out what acts have specifically been done against him and his family by the Watchtower Society and why on earth, if they are truly unprecedented and vicious acts, are the police not involved???
It is not confidence-inspiring to broadcast the kind of charges Mr Unthank does and then to slip away from giving us specifics when we ask. Perhaps the actual answer is as follows: The big bad Watchtower has had the temerity to offend Mr Unthank because its representatives did not fall to their knees and cry out abjectly, "We are so very sorry". They even tried to defend the charges he laid against them. Should they have done so? Quite frankly, No. They needed to have listened to the charges. But they didn't. They can be justifiably condemned for that. But as far as I can ascertain, they have not engaged in "unprecedented" and "vicious" acts of persecution - not unless these words have changed their meanings so completely they now encapsulate the wounded pride of a righteously indignant litigant. It seems it is not only the Watchtower's craven pride that is at hard work here.
After all the huffing and puffing has ebbed, I'd just like my simple question answered about what "unprecedented" and "vicious" acts of persecution has the Watchtower Society carried out against this man and his family?
P.S., would some kind person please forward this to Mr Unthank. I've given up sending him unanswered messages. Thank you in advance.