Yep, Mormonism is about faith, just as many other religions claim to be; however, we’re more open to science and what it teaches us than any other religion that I’ve found. As I’ve taken pains to mention, science keeps rewriting itself. Text books that are even now being published will be obsolete in a decade. To dismiss a religion because of a perceived contradiction between it and a “snapshot” of scientific thought is, in my view, the height of error. Yet some people demand that a religion is absolutely demonstrable and subject to the scientific method.
But is this fair? Qcumbr has correctly explained our view of why we’re here and where we’re going — the purpose of life.
I have no problems discussing this further, though a JW website might not be the best venue for it.
Those who are interested in discussing this, please leave me a private message here with your e-mail. And before we get underway, it might help to know what your former religious views were (if any) and your present views. It would be helpful to also have a mail client like Outlook or Gmail, where you can receive HTML formatted messages. And finally, it would be helpful to have a copy of the Book of Mormon (though for most of this discussion, the two chapters of Nephi will be enough). Qcumbr undoubtedly has one and I can arrange to get anyone else a copy.
I do believe there is enough evidence to demonstrate that the Book of Mormon is not only plausible, but that there’s substantial evidence in its favor. As mentioned previously, with the amount of information we now have about Mesoamerican languages, DNA, cultures and history, if the Book of Mormon were false, the evidence against it should not continue to concatenate each year in favor of its credibility.
Just let me know if you'd like to do this.