by tornapart 427 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
'Remarkably it seems like a number of people here are very upset about me not believing in dating methods.
I would say multiple pairs of underwear are bunched up in knots over this thread.'
I think not. Its called reasoning w someone. I noticed that you threw out little baits for people to nibble. So, this is our chance to see how bunched up they are. Say the word, and i'll start the thread.
S
I wasn't throwing out bait, I posted kent Hovinds video and you wanted me to comment
on it I said I didnt want to. I just wanted the curious to watch with out the distractions.
I'd say the record in black and white on this thread shows you baited me.
Page 7 both you and Cofty baited me. I just posted a video.
' I posted kent Hovinds video and you wanted me to commenton it I said I didnt want to.'
Okay. But, i don't see me wanting you to use your own words as baiting you. However, your setting out several small conditions that would collapse your belief is what i consider bait.
A person could see the person posting those vids and your citations of scripture, without even quoting the actual words of those scriptures as a person hiding behind vids and scriptures.
S
I dont agree with you.
Page 7 both you and Cofty baited me.
I didn't bait you James. I posed a very reasonable challenge which you have still failed to respond to...
JAMES BROWN - Here is a challenge. Choose the most compelling point from the video and write it up here in your own words
Still waiting.
I am convinced you don't actually understand what Hovind babbles on about. You just hear words like "circular" and it makes you feel all safe about your supertitious dogmas.
The video was relevant to the original posters topic.
It show that we didnt evolve.
I said to you don't watch it, it was not for you.
But you and cofty baited me.
Now you turn the tables on me.
That's the way this place is.
How many times do I have to tell you cofty.
Man can not date rocks with radiometric methods.
When they know the date of the rock they date it wrong.
When they don't know the date, they claim they date them right.
Which I don't believe but since no one knows the date of the rock
they hide behind that.
Based on your previous response I don't think you understand my contention
or get my drift. It is a major contention of Kent Hovinds who you say you are familiar
with and will disprove but you don't even know or under stand what he or I are talking
about.
We have been through this more than once on this thread.
I'm not buying your or others explanations.
If you cant disprove my original contention there is no use going any further.
And you are not proving it to me. You are only proving it to yourself and those like you.
Baiting is baiting, I know cops say they don't bait johns with prostitutes but baiting is baiting.
It show that we didnt evolve.
No it actually showed that Hovind is a liar and that you don't understand the most basic facts about science.
There have been numerous excellent posts in this thread that totally dismantled Hovind's lies which you have completely ignored.
You have done a great service to science, reason and rational thinking by publicly demonstrating what happens when you commit to christian fundamentalism.
If you cant disprove my original contention there is no use going any further.
I did at length on page 9. What words didn't you understand?
I'm not buying your or others explanations.
You don't read them so how can you reject them?
Cofty you didnt explain how your radiometric dating works on page 9 to me
just to your lackeys.
If you read my response I gave you a d for effort.
Man can not date rocks
when they know the date they get the date wrong when they
don't know the date, they think they got the date correct.
How can you believe them to date millions of years when they cant date 5 years?
If somebody confused them so they couldn't use their circular reasoning that is the technicians
who ran the Geiger counters fault. If you need to know the strata the rock came from to calibrate
your clock that is circular reasoning. I am not going to tell you this again.
I think you are playing with me now. It is going beyond baiting.
Every single word of your previous post is just plain wrong.
If you read my post on page 9 carefully and if you read Wien's article you would know why it was totally wrong. But you don't because you choose the familiar comforts willful ignorance.
The following is perhaps the most erroneous line in your post..
If you need to know the strata the rock came from to calibrate your clock
You don't. I explained this at length.
