Another poster on here called Separation of Powers made a profound comment on another thread recently that I thought was worthy of starting a new thread about:
"In my opinion, the new light regarding the FDS addresses this question, if there was no FDS from the 3rd century on until 1918, and yet the article states that there were anointed followers here and there during that almost 2000 years of no FDS, then what organization did they follow? There was no organization, yet they were anointed per the article. It appears that they must have simply been judged worthy without any affiliation to any standing organization. That point, my friends, will be the most difficult aspect of the new light to try to make sense of. Over the course of the modern day organization, it has been driven home that God does not work without an organization to represent his interests. Well, that is apparently no longer the case."
I think the logic here is indisputable and compelling. One can be of the 'anointed' and approved by God regardless of what religious organisation you belong to at any given time in history.
Agree/disagree/unsure?