You are the one who implied there was some type of causation between religion and crime rate in this country. That was your logical fallacy that led me to point it out.
---
I "implied" no such thing. You drew an erroneous conclusion based on personal bias.
If you re-read what I actually posted, you'll see that what I said was, based on numerous studies, more secular nations end up at the top of the list for less crime, higher quality of life, etc. The conclusion of these studies demonstrated that religion does not necessarily correlate to higher morality.
Nowhere did I even remotely imply that religion CAUSES crime, like gang violence. I did say that the religiosity of a nation does not necessarily correlate to lower crime rates and higher morality. There's a big difference.
Furthermore, I did not "scold" you. What I do have a problem with is when a person claims I said something when, in fact, I never said it. I will call you out if you promote falsehoods and try to derail a discussion with Strawman arguments.
---
My point about atheism and China/Russia is very valid, especially after you had specifically scolded someone else for having their facts wrong.
---
Sorry, but you are not correct. As I explained and provided source material for, while China and Russia may have an official governmental policy of atheism, they do not restrict freedom of religion. In fact, China is the foundation of some of the world's oldest religions.
It seems from your rant that you start from an attitude of fault-finding and criticism, seasoned with healthy doses of looking for offense, then assert that the "offender" is the one at fault for your baseless conclusions.
That's precisely why so many of the ridiculous religion=violence "arguments" have been so easily put down. And that's precisely why it is so difficult for anyone looking for a balanced view on dubs or religion in general to take this forum seriously, because nearly every topic always wants to devolve into either "you're religious so you're stupid" or "you're religious so you're violent" in the end.
And, you are able to provide proof that these assertions are actually true?
You have made some sweeping accusations. You should be willing to back it up with evidence.