I just finished reading it. I would not like to be in the Watchtower's shoes, Simmons has done an outstanding job.
This really stood out to me on page 48 where the Watchtower tried to put the blame on Candace's parents ...
Defendants claim that plaintiffs’ parents owed plaintiff a legal duty
to protect her from Kendrick’s abuse. (WNY AOB 40; NFC AOB 51.)
They point out that the parents had received Awake! and Watchtower
articles on child abuse which informed them of steps they could have taken
to protect plaintiff from child abusers. (WNY AOB 40; NFC AOB 51.)
So when JWs think the Watchtower are lovingly providing information about how parents can protect their children from abuse what they are actually doing is trying to cover their own legal liability.
Also this from page 69...
Rule 8.204(a)(1)(2)(C) of the California Rules of Court requires an
appellant’s opening brief to provide a summary of the significant facts
limited to matters in the record. The opening briefs of both Watchtower and
the Congregation violate this rule. Each omits critical facts, including the
fact that the elders assigned Jonathan Kendrick and Candace Conti together in field service.
Lying, cheating bastards.