larc
I have the four main Watchtwer photocopies about 1975 still here with me.
The one where Generation means life span
The one with the train
The one with the chart showing 6000 years of human existence ends in 75
And some other I cant remember right now.
False prophesy wouldent make a dent in them. I mentioned it before and they just dismissed it. Either that or they lied. One or the other.
What am I supposed to do then. Mabe if you explain abit more why I shouldent go in to the basics of the psychology behind it, from your expert perspective then i would better understand.
But in my limited experience, cognitive dissonance always kicks in.
When you show them something irrefutable, they come back and tell you thanks for making my faith stronger. Like my gf did at one point.
I wouldent mind hearing why you think I shouldent go into it though.
But here is the situation as it is.
-------------------------------
At the end of our discussion I started to mention Churches like Scientology and The Moonies, and even the Mormans, and showed them that they were taling up a large percentage of new converts.
I also mentioned Jonestown and Heavens gate.
At first they wanted just dismiss them as silly people who were stupid enough to follow some guy claming to be the Massiah or something and dident think much of it.
But when I started to tell that people have begun to study this phenomeon and there was a scientific explanition why people get involved with those kind of groups, they showed more intrest.
They could have been just patronizing me though, i'm not too shure.
I know for shure that arguring the bible with them will make absolutely no sense because when I asked them to rationalize the fact that jesus is a god in light of Isaih 43:10-11, they dident even blink.
On the topic of false prophesy they dont really care if it werent true.
But what did make an impact was the thought of the presense starting in 1874 instead of 1914.
The female is the more mature witness and I think that she runs the show with reguards to public speaking.
The guy is more heruistic (sp?) in in his thought processes. i picked this up early in the conversation. He dosent really like to think.
I noticed that when i asked him if he was happy as a witness that he took about 30-45's to anwser the question.
It was only when I asked him if he was more happy now than he was before he was a witness thathe said yes.
The guy is the weak link.
But the woman is taking the lead in the discussion so i have to figure out a way to close in on the guys emotions while distracting the woman with arguments since shes more systamatic.
If you nee any more characteristics to make a better assessment of the situation just shoot.
jerome
The Bible is a two edged sword wield it for evil and it you may get hurt.