So given that the black vote is so important do people honestly think there is still systematic discrimination toward blacks today? Usually the people with the important votes hold the power and there is a black president and black people in every high office imaginable ... doesn't that weaken the claims of discrimination and subjugation?
From what I've heard, stories of discrimination sound unfair and overstated - that is, they can be everyday events that happen to everyone but are interpretted by some as happening 'because they are black' (and questioning the validity of claims brings more accusations of racism).
Claims of unfair treatment under the law sound unfair but the cases held up as examples fall apart under scrutiny or the stats and policies show the opposite (eg black youths not even charged to massage the crime figures).
Increased number of stop and search of one group sounds biased until you look at the stats and see this small minority committing 95% of a crime ... wouldn't it be silly not to focus efforts in the most practical way possible?
Claims that it's ongoing white domination sound a little hollow when the areas with the biggest problems have huge black majority populations and black leaders / government.
Claims that crimes involving white targetting of blacks an epedemic show the exact opposite when we look at the statistics and all show black crime out of control and the biggest problem.
Yes, the past was ugly but it is the past and was forgotten and erased when a political party passed a bill yet things are brought up for matters that are obviously disconnected and simple law and order issues. Why does it only seem to be brought up and used as a club to bollster weak claim of racism in the modern day?
So we come back to what the president alluded to - why are black youths turning to crime and violence? What is wrong or missing with their upbringing? Why are people looking for a crime that didn't happen?
I would add: why does it appear that some people are being brought up to see and claim racism at every opportunity?
I know it's the thing no one is supposed to mention and point out ... but that never makes something untrue.
There are laws specifically targetting racism which can and should be used but only when racism has actually happened. They should not be used as a fallback for regular cases when the virdict doesn't suit a group solely on racial grounds. Are those laws being applied equally to racist crimes on both sides? Are there stats for those convictions and do they match the inter-racial crime stats?
BTW: I understand some will find the content of this post inflamatory ... in which case they should easily be able to point out the flaws in arguments, statistics or logic without insults.