Just a few issues I had from looking at this potential New York-printed toilet paper:
pg 4: The Lie That Made God Nameless
This sub-article talks about how God's name is Jehovah and quotes Isaiah 42:8 "I am Jehovah. That is my name." I take issue with this because they later go on to say that you cannot know God as a person or love God if you don't know his name. But what about calling God by the wrong name? I imagine a jealous, vengeful deity would harbor ill feelings with being called somebody else's name. If I called my wife by some other woman's name, she would certainly have a problem with it. And it can try to be argued that Jehovah is a latinized form of Yahweh, but if I called my brother Matthew "Mateo," he wouldn't like it. In fact, he used to get pretty pissed when I would call him Mateo.
Wouldn't a deity who is infinitely powerful and wrathful become angered with a century of Bible Students calling him the wrong name? Or even be upset when they formed a group refering to him with the wrong name? And if not, why would it matter if we use his name at all?
pg 12,13,14: She was declared "righteous by her works."
For a group that claims to value truth, I take issue with their repeated efforts to whitewash characters from the Bible. Numerous images of Jesus as a white man, numerous depictions of God and the angels as white men, and in this Watchtower, Rahab is portrayed as a white, fair-skinned ginger. I don't recall scripture describing her as such but I don't recall many middle-eastern gingers.
pg 16: Who will go to heaven and why?
Why don't they say in the public edition what they so freely print in the study edition? If they proudly believe only 144,000 will be going to heaven, why not state it to the public? Why not state that those "rulers" they are writing about only consist of the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses? Or that of the 144,000 rulers, only the GB will rule among them?