The Journey of Humans, Across the face of Planet

by fulltimestudent 19 Replies latest social current

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    I've culled these articles from Past Horizons to illustrate the few things we can know about a journey that was unrecorded, its only modern science that let's us discern some of the details and the path via the study of the human genome. At this stage I've culled seven articles that indicate some evidence of this journey:

    The journey is still thought to commence in Africa,

    PAST HORIZONS

    http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/03/2011/hunter-gatherer-genetics-study-show-modern-humans-originated-in-southern-africa

    HUNTER GATHERER GENETICS STUDY SHOW MODERN HUMANS ORIGINATED IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

    Article created on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

    By Sandeep Ravindran

    The largest analysis of the genomic diversity of African hunter-gatherer populations reveals that modern humans likely originated in southern Africa, rather than eastern Africa as is generally assumed. This study provides the clearest idea of where modern humans actually originated.

    About 60,000 years ago, modern humans left Africa and began the spread to other regions of the world. But the great genetic diversity of African populations made it hard to accurately predict where in Africa humans might have originated. Now, a Stanford University team led by post-doctoral fellow Brenna Henn of the Department of Genetics and biology Professor Marcus Feldman has found that modern humans likely originated in southern Africa. To come to this conclusion, the researchers analysed the largest dataset to date for hunter-gatherer populations. The study appears online March 7 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Our belief used to be that the centre of humans leaving Africa was in East Africa. This paper focuses attention on southern Africa, and in particular to a group of hunter-gatherers, the Bushmen, who speak one of the Khoisan languages,” said Feldman. These languages are characterized by the presence of “click” sounds.

    Africa has been inferred to be the continent of origin for all modern human populations, with the earliest skulls of modern humans having been discovered in east Africa. In addition, populations outside Africa contain a subset of the genetic diversity found there. As modern humans moved eastward, the level of variation decreased, reaching its minimum in the Americas. But the details of genetic evolution within Africa have always been hazy.

    This is mainly because African populations are some of the most genetically diverse in the world. A lack of sufficient genetic samples, especially from the hunter-gatherer populations, made it hard to infer much about early human evolutionary history. “We’ve just never had enough people represented in our studies before,” Feldman said. “Without the participation of these people, patterns of evolution within Africa can’t be determined,” .

    The current study provides “a much more satisfying answer,” added Feldman, “We just didn’t have as much DNA data earlier,”. Before this study, only a handful of Namibian Khoisan-speakers had been compared with other Africans. To get an accurate picture, the group needed to compare the genetics of different hunter-gatherer populations, as well as individuals within each population, at hundreds of thousands of sites in the DNA. According to Feldman, the researchers needed the participation of more Bushmen, and Brenna Henn, the paper’s first author, accomplished this.

    The scientists analysed variations in the individual nucleotide bases that make up DNA. They genotyped 650,000 such individual changes or “single-nucleotide polymorphisms” in people from 25 African populations. Apart from the click-speaking hunter-gatherer populations from South Africa and Tanzania, they also studied Pygmies and 21 agriculturalist populations. Statistical analysis showed that the Bushmen had the greatest genetic variation and are most likely to be the source population from which all other African populations diverged.

    Different genetic variants contain different combinations of genes, which can be thought of as appearing on a single string. Genetic recombination breaks these strings into smaller segments. The older the population, the shorter the segments and the greater the genetic variation. It was already known that the most variation and hence the shortest segments occurred in Africa. The new study found that within Africa, the Bushmen have the shortest segments, and segment length increases as one moves from south to north.

    More than 5,000 years ago, sub-Saharan Africa was populated mainly by linguistically and culturally diverse hunter-gatherer populations. Since then, most of these populations have either gone extinct or turned to agriculture and pastoral living, leaving only the Pygmies in central Africa, a click-speaking tribe of Tanzania, the Hadza, and southern African Bushmen, as the last hunter-gatherers.

    The paper is also fascinating in that some hunter-gatherer groups have never mixed with their neighbours,” said Feldman. “The mystery is whether there ever was a connection between the different click-speaking peoples in the past. Brenna and the team have shown that if such a connection ever existed, it was a long time before the invention of agriculture.”

    As evidence of the uniqueness of some of these populations, the researchers found that certain immune system proteins that show up almost nowhere else on the planet occurred at a relatively high frequency in one hunter-gatherer group. The scientists also found signs of natural selection related to genes involved in immune response and protection against pathogens.

    Henn along with Julie Granka, a graduate student in biology, recently revisited the South African Bushmen who participated in the study and took height and skin colour measurements from the people whose DNA they had analysed. “We will be collaborating with several South African scholars to look at such phenotypes in more detail,” Feldman said.

    According to Feldman, despite some large ongoing projects researchers still don’t know enough about human variation. “There’s a tremendous amount of genomic variation,” he said, “but not enough populations around the world have been studied.” For example, “We don’t know very much about Australian Aboriginals, indigenous Americans or even South Asian people, who comprise nearly a sixth of the world’s population,” Feldman said.

    Feldman and other researchers working with the Human Genome Diversity Project, based at CEPH (Centre d’Étude du Polymorphisme Humain) in Paris, hope to engage other populations around the world in the search for their evolutionary ancestry. “There are lots of evolutionary problems that are still to be solved,” said Feldman, “…and analysis of DNA is our best chance to solve them.”

    Sandeep Ravindran is a science-writing intern at the Stanford News Service

    The Feldman Lab: http://www-evo.stanford.edu/index.html

    Study document full text: Hunter-gatherer genomic diversity suggests a southern
    African origin for modern humans – http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/03/01/1017511108.full.pdf+html

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    If Southern Africa stands up as the starting point of the human journey, we must find evidence for human movement out of Africa - this may be one of the first solid indications of the human journey.

    OMAN DISCOVERIES IDENTIFY ONE OF THE FIRST HUMANS OUT OF AFRICA

    Article created on Friday, December 2, 2011

    A series of new archaeological discoveries in the Sultanate of Oman, nestled in the southeastern corner of the Arabian Peninsula, reveals the timing and identity of one of the first modern human groups to migrate out of Africa, according to a research article published in the open-access journal PLoS ONE

    (Map that wont copy -will provide web reference)

    Distribution of Nubian Complex sites and findspots depicted, as well as MSA/MP sites with human remains. To account for shoreline configuration ~100 ka, sea level is adjusted to −40 m below present levels. Nubian Complex sites include: Jebel Urayf (1), Jebel Naquah (2), Nazlet Khater (3), Abydos (4), Makhadma (5), Taramsa Hill (6), Sodmein Cave (7), Kharga Oasis (8), Bir Tarfawi (9), Bir Sahara (10), Abu Simbel (11), Jebel Brinikol (12), 1035 (13), 1038 (14), Sai Island (15), Gorgora Rockshelter (16), K'One (17), Hargeisa (18), Shabwa (19), Wadi Wa'shah (20), Aybut Al Auwal (21), Aybut Ath Thani (22), Mudayy As Sodh (23), and Jebel Sanoora (24). Image PLosONE

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    International team

    An international team of archaeologists and geologists working in the Dhofar Mountains of southern Oman, led by Dr. Jeffrey Rose of the University of Birmingham, report finding over 100 new sites classified as “Nubian Middle Stone Age (MSA).” Distinctive Nubian MSA stone tools are well known throughout the Nile Valley; however, this is the first time such sites have ever been found outside of Africa.

    According to the authors, the evidence from Oman provides a “trail of stone breadcrumbs” left by early humans migrating across the Red Sea on their journey out of Africa. “After a decade of searching in southern Arabia for some clue that might help us understand early human expansion, at long last we’ve found the smoking gun of their exit from Africa,” says Rose. “What makes this so exciting,” he adds, “is that the answer is a scenario almost never considered

    Challenging long-held assumptions

    These new findings challenge long-held assumptions about the timing and route of early human expansion out of Africa. Using a technique called Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) to date one of the sites in Oman, researchers have determined that Nubian MSA toolmakers had entered Arabia by 106,000 years ago, if not earlier. This date is considerably older than geneticists have put forth for the modern human exodus from Africa, who estimate the dispersal of our species occurred between 70,000 and 40,000 years ago.

    Opportunistic hunters

    Even more surprising, all of the Nubian MSA sites were found far inland, contrary to the currently accepted theory that envisions early human groups moving along the coast of southern Arabia. “Here we have an example of the disconnect between theoretical models versus real evidence on the ground,” says co-author Professor Emeritus Anthony Marks of Southern Methodist University. “The coastal expansion hypothesis looks reasonable on paper, but there is simply no archaeological evidence to back it up. Genetics predict an expansion out of Africa after 70,000 thousand years ago, yet we’ve seen three separate discoveries published this year with evidence for humans in Arabia thousands, if not tens of thousands of years prior to this date.”

    (Another image that wont copy

    Nubian Type 1 cores from Aybut Al Auwal. Image: PLosONE

    The presence of Nubian MSA sites in Oman corresponds to a wet period in Arabia’s climatic history, when copious rains fell across the peninsula and transformed its barren deserts to sprawling grasslands. “For a while,” remarks Rose, “South Arabia became a verdant paradise rich in resources – large game, plentiful freshwater, and high-quality flint with which to make stone tools.” Far from innovative fishermen, it seems that early humans spreading from Africa into Arabia were opportunistic hunters travelling along river networks like highways. Whether or not these pioneers were able to survive in Arabia during the hyperarid conditions of the Last Ice Age is another matter – a mystery that will require archaeologists to continue combing the deserts of southern Arabia, hot on the trail of stone breadcrumbs.

    Source: PLosONE press release


    More information:

    • The Dhofar Archaeological Project is conducted under the auspices of the Ministry of Heritage and Culture in Oman. The team is comprised of an interdisciplinary group of researchers from the University of Birmingham and Oxford Brookes University, UK; Arizona State University and Southern Methodist University, USA; Institute of Archaeology, National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine; Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Science, Czech Republic; University of Tübingen, Germany, and the University of Wollongong, Australia. The project is funded by research grants from the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Australian Research Council.
    • Rose JI, Usik VI, Marks AE, Hilbert YH, Galletti CS, et al. (2011) The Nubian Complex of Dhofar, Oman: An African Middle Stone Age Industry in Southern Arabia. PLoS ONE 6(11): e28239.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028239
    • More on this story at AAAS News Science
    • The Nubian Complex in southern Arabia, 106,000 years ago , Dienekes Anthropology Blog (extensive analysis of this story)

    web-reference for article:

    http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/12/2011/oman-discoveries-identify-one-of-the-first-humans-out-of-africa

    Map of finds can be found on that web-page

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    The journey north from southern Africa was likely aided by teh different climate of Saharan climate. There seems to have been other river systems, as well as the Nile Valley, that may aided migrations.

    web-reference: http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/paleorivers-across-sahara-may-have.html#.UjTuQcZmhcZ

    Paleorivers across Sahara may have supported ancient human migration routes

    Posted by TANN Ancient Environment , Anthropology, Breakingnews, Early Humans , Earth Science 9:30 PM

    Three ancient river systems, now buried, may have created viable routes for human migration across the Sahara to the Mediterranean region about 100,000 years ago, according to research published September 11 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Tom Coulthard from the University of Hull, UK, and colleagues from other institutions.

    Paleorivers across Sahara may have supported ancient human migration routes
    Simulated probability of surface water during the last interglacial [Credit: Coulthard TJ, Ramirez JA, Barton N, Rogerson M, Brücher T (2013) Were Rivers Flowing across the Sahara During the Last Interglacial? Implications for Human Migration through Africa. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74834. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074834]

    Simulating paleoclimates in the region, the researchers found quantitative evidence of three major river systems that likely existed in North Africa 130,000-100,000 years ago, but are now largely buried by dune systems in the desert.

    When flowing, these rivers likely provided fertile habitats for animals and vegetation, creating 'green corridors' across the region. At least one river system is estimated to have been 100 km wide and largely perennial.

    The Irharhar river, westernmost of the three identified, may represent a likely route of human migration across the region. In addition to rivers, the researchers' simulations predict massive lagoons and wetlands in northeast Libya, some of which span over 70,000-square kilometers.

    "It's exciting to think that 100,000 years ago there were three huge rivers forcing their way across a 1000km of the Sahara desert to the Mediterranean -- and that our ancestors could have walked alongside them" said Coulthard.

    Previous studies have shown that people travelled across the Saharan mountains toward more fertile Mediterranean regions, but when, where and how they did so is a subject of debate.

    Existing evidence supports the possibilities of a single trans-Saharan migration, many migrations along one route, or multiple migrations along several different routes.

    The existence of 'green corridors' that provided water and food resources were likely critical to these events, but their location and the amount of water they carried is not known.

    The simulations provided in this study aim to quantify the probability that these routes may have been viable for human migration across the region.

    Source: Public Library of Science [September 11, 2013]

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    This next overview suggests that there may have been more than one wave of migration, a view that makes some sense of what we see now.

    http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/09/2011/first-out-of-africa-first-into-asia-and-australia

    FIRST OUT OF AFRICA, FIRST INTO ASIA AND AUSTRALIA

    Article created on Sunday, September 25, 2011

    The first major genome analysis of Australian Aboriginal people reveals that their ancestors took part in the first human migration out of Africa.

    They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians appeared. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of the region about 50,000 years ago.

    A far reaching study

    This study, adds to a growing body of evidence that contradicts the popular theory that modern humans came from a single out-of-Africa migration wave into Europe, Asia, and Australia by confirming that Aboriginal Australians took part in the first of two rounds of human expansion and movement.

    “Aboriginal Australians descend from the first human explorers,” explains lead author and University of Copenhagen professor Eske Willerslev in a news release. “While the ancestors of Europeans and Asians were sitting somewhere in Africa or the Middle East, yet to explore their world further, the ancestors of Aboriginal Australians spread rapidly … traversing unknown territory in Asia and finally crossing the sea into Australia.”

    The study began from a lock of hair which was given to British anthropologist, Dr. Alfred Cort Haddon, by an Aboriginal man from the Goldfields region of Western Australia in 1923

    The lock of hair which provided the genome sequence. Image: Science/AAAS

    (Check original article for image)

    The study began from a lock of hair which was given to British anthropologist, Dr. Alfred Cort Haddon, by an Aboriginal man from the Goldfields region of Western Australia in 1923. Nearly a hundred years later, researchers have isolated DNA from this same hair, using it to explore the genetics of the first Australians and to provide insights into how humans first dispersed across the globe.

    The genome, shown to have no genetic input from modern European Australians, reveals that the ancestors of the Aboriginal man separated from the ancestors of other human populations some 64-75,000 years ago. Aboriginal Australians therefore descend directly from the earliest modern explorers, people who migrated into Asia before finally reaching Australia about 50,000 years ago.

    There's an informative diagram demonstrating the gene flow spread (as it can be currently re-constructed) I can't copy and paste the diagram, but you can see it in the original article

    Reconstruction of early spread of modern humans outside Africa. The tree shows the divergence of the Aboriginal Australian (ABR) relative to the CEPH European (CEU) and the Han Chinese (HAN) with gene flow between aboriginal Australasians and Asian ancestors. Purple arrowshows early spread of the ancestors of Aboriginal Australians into eastern Asia ~62,000 to 75,000 years B.P. (ka BP), exchanging genes with Denisovans, and reaching Australia ~50,000 years B.P. Black arrow shows spread of East Asians ~25,000 to 38,000 years B.P. and admixing with remnants of the early dispersal (red arrow) some time before the split between Asians and Native American ancestors ~15,000 to 30,000 years B.P. YRI, Yoruba. Image: Science/AAAS

    In showing this, the study establishes Aboriginal Australians as the population with the longest association with the land on which they live today. This research is presented with the full endorsement of the Goldfields Land and Sea Council, the organization that represents the Aboriginal traditional owners for the region.

    How does genome-sequencing work?

    The genome has been compared to a ‘book’ with three billion letters. By sequencing the genome of the Australian Aboriginal individual, the team managed to find all the letters in the book. Currently we still do not fully understand the language the book is written in, but it can be compared to similar ‘books‘, or genomes from other populations to learn about differences and similarities between the populations.

    Technically, it is now easier to sequence genomes. First the genome is cut into small pieces, this ‘chopped-up DNA’ is then fed into a machine that can identify all the various shorter strands. It is as if a book has been shredded and then one must figure out how all the pieces fit together. The first time this was carried out for humans it was an incredible achievement. But, now with other humans to compare sequences with, it is no longer as difficult.

    Far reaching implications

    The study has wide implications for understanding how our human ancestors moved across the globe. So far only ancient human genomes have been obtained from hair preserved under frozen conditions. The researchers have now shown that hair preserved in much less ideal conditions can be used for genome sequencing without risk of modern human contamination that is typical in ancient bones and teeth. Through analysis of museum collections, and in collaboration with descendent groups, researchers can now study the genetic history of many indigenous populations worldwide, even where groups have recently moved about or intermingled.

    Professor Douglas Kell, Chief Executive, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council said “In a new era of rapid genome sequencing, one of the most powerful approaches to understanding human biology will be to make comparisons between the genomes of multiple individuals – so-called population genomics. One of the options is to do this according to geography and so learn about, for example, early human migration or the localised evolution of health and disease.”


    More information:

    The paper detailing this study is published online by the journal Science at the Science Express website. It will also be published in the September 23 issue of Science, a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

    An Aboriginal Australian Genome Reveals Separate Human Dispersals into Asia

    Morten Rasmussen, Xiaosen Guo, Yong Wang, Kirk E. Lohmueller, Simon Rasmussen, Anders Albrechtsen, Line Skotte, Stinus Lindgreen, Mait Metspalu, Thibaut Jombart, Toomas Kivisild, Weiwei Zhai, Anders Eriksson, Andrea Manica, Ludovic Orlando, Francisco De La Vega, Silvana Tridico, Ene Metspalu, Kasper Nielsen, María C. Ávila-Arcos, J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Craig Muller, Joe Dortch, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Ole Lund, Agata Wesolowska, Monika Karmin, Lucy A. Weinert, Bo Wang, Jun Li, Shuaishuai Tai, Fei Xiao, Tsunehiko Hanihara, George van Driem, Aashish R. Jha, François-Xavier Ricaut, Peter de Knijff, Andrea B Migliano, Irene Gallego-Romero, Karsten Kristiansen, David M. Lambert, Søren Brunak, Peter Forster, Bernd Brinkmann, Olaf Nehlich, Michael Bunce, Michael Richards, Ramneek Gupta, Carlos D. Bustamante, Anders Krogh, Robert A. Foley, Marta M. Lahr, Francois Balloux, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Richard Villems, Rasmus Nielsen, Wang Jun, and Eske Willerslev

    Published online 22 September 2011 [DOI:10.1126/science.1211177]

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Pretty interesting. I've always wondered about the people who spread out across the earth way before the Europeans got to the same places -- the American Indians, island dwellers, Aborigines, Ainu, etc. Not surprising if it turns out that the Aborigines are the oldest of the bunch.

  • glenster
    glenster

    Assumptions About Origins of Life Challenged
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130913185848.htm

  • cofty
    cofty

    Marking thanks FullTimeStudent.

    Glenster - good article but way off-topic.

    It would make a good thread topic.

  • glenster
    glenster

    Dating of Beads Sets New Timeline for Early Humans
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130913093314.htm

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    Thnx for posting additional details, the scientific work on genomes has brought a fascinating aspect to the difficulties of exploring the spread of humans across the planet.

    Apognophos:

    I agree, the peoples you listed are interesting. The concept of more than one migration may offer some explanation to some problematical features of human life today.

    And difficult ethnic questions. What sort of people were in the first migration? If Australian aborigines are descended unchanged from the first migrants, do we see original humans when we see them? Do they live much as first humans did. Difficult question, particularly as some argue that there is evidence of Australian Native people having built more substantial stone dwellings in the past.

    Then, there are the Melanesian peoples of Papua-New Guinea, living lives so similar to native Australians. Why did they stick to traditional life when there was likely some contact with the inhabitants of other (now Indonesia) Islands whose lives were more advanced.

    Polynesians may be descended from the native peoples of Taiwan.

    And native Americans will be covered in another post.

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    We've known of Neanderthal man for some time, and a lot of thought and research has been circulated about them. But in 2008 another type of hominin was found, neither neanderthal or modern human. The remains were found in a cave in southern Siberia known as Denisova (in 2008) hence the given identifier, Denisovan man

    They are discussed in the next article:

    web-reference: http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/12/2011/humans-on-many-roads-to-asia

    HUMANS ON MANY ROADS TO ASIA

    Article created on Tuesday, December 27, 2011

    The discovery by Russian archaeologists of the remains of an extinct prehistoric human during the excavation of Denisova Cave in Southern Siberia in 2008 was nothing short of a scientific sensation. The sequencing of the nuclear genome taken from a circa. 30,000-year-old finger bone revealed that Denisova man was neither a Neanderthal nor modern human, but a new form of hominin. Minute traces of the Denisova genome are still found in some individuals living today. The comparisons of the DNA of modern humans and prehistoric human species provide new indications of how human populations settled in Asia over 44,000 years ago.

    Tracking Denisovan DNA

    As scientists from Harvard Medical School in Boston (USA) and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig have discovered, the Denisova hominin passed on genetic material not only to populations that live in New Guinea today, but also to Australian aborigines and population groups in the Philippines. David Reich, professor of Genetics at Harvard Medical School, says: “The Denisovan DNA is comparable to a medical contrast agent that can be used to make a person’s blood vessels visible. It has such a high recognition value that even small volumes can be detected in individuals. Therefore, we were able to track down Denisovan DNA in human dispersals. The sequencing of prehistoric DNA is an important tool for researching human evolution.”

    The scientists have discovered that, contrary to the information available up to now, modern humans possibly populated Asia in at least two migration waves. According to David Reich, the original inhabitants who still populate Southeast Asia and Oceania today came from the first migration wave. Later migrations formed populations in East Asia that are related to the population found in Southeast Asia today.

    (Image I cant copy and paste : 3D rendering of the Denisova phalanx. The blue concave surface shows the articulation, the green colour stands for the rest of the bone. © MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology)

    Accordingly, Denisova hominins were spread across an extraordinarily large ecological and geographical area extending from Siberia to tropical Southeast Asia. “The fact that Denisovan DNA can be detected in some but not other original inhabitant populations living in Southeast Asia today shows that numerous populations with and without Denisovan DNA existed over 44,000 years ago,”says Mark Stoneking, professor at the Department of Evolutionary Genetics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and leading author of the study. “The simplest explanation for the presence of Denisovan genetic material in some but not all groups is that Denisova people themselves lived in Southeast Asia.”

    In December 2010, Svante Pääbo from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology reported in the journal Naturethat Denisova hominins contributed genes to human populations living in New Guinea today.

    Genetic footprint

    The new study, which was initiated by Mark Stoneking – an expert in the field of human genetic variation in Southeast Asia and Oceania – is now researching the genetic footprint that the Denisova hominin has left behind in us modern humans. The scientists analysed the genomes of 33 populations living in Southeast Asia and Oceania today, including people from Borneo, Fiji, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea and Polynesia. Some of this data were already available and others were recorded in the context of the current study.

    (another image I'm unable to copy and paste: Figure from the study, with pie charts showing how much archaic Denisova ancestry each population has, as a percent of what is found in New Guinea. Denisovan genes are only detected in eastern Southeast Asia and Oceania; they are not detectable at all in mainland Asia. © Art For Science n. David Reich)

    The analysis carried out by the researchers shows that the Denisova hominin contributed genetic material not only to the people living in New Guinea today but also to Australian aborigines, the Mamanwa, a Philippine “Negrito” group, and some other populations in eastern Southeast Asia and Oceania. In contrast, western and northwestern groups, including other “Negrito” groups, such as the Onge people who inhabit the Andaman Islands and the Jehai of Malaysia, and the mainland East Asians did not mix with the Denisova people.

    The researchers conclude from this that Denisova hominins interbred with modern humans at least 44,000 years ago, before the Australians and inhabitants of New Guinea separated from each other. As opposed to this, Southeast Asia was first colonised by modern humans who were not related to today’s Chinese and Indonesian populations. The latter arrived in the course of subsequent migratory movements. This hypothesis on the settlement of Southeast Asia and Oceania, which is referred to as the “South Route” has already been substantiated by archaeological finds. However, strong support in the form of genetic evidence has yet to be found.


    More information:

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit