There is another flawed premise regarding this flavor of topic:
I've yet to see a pro-God topic like this posted by anyone other than a Christian. The debate between evolution vs. creation/ theist vs. atheist boils down to this for the Christian: when they think they've debunked an evolutionist/atheist position, the Christian automatically concludes it has proven the existence of their god (the "Christian" god). This is the height of arrogance!
If god exists, does not the Hindu, the Jew, a Satanist or the Muslim or any of the thousands of other religions have equal claim and probability of being correct? Whatever god a person claims to believe in, for them, that is the true god. History has documented at least 30,000 distinct gods; Hinduism allows for millions of gods. A theist has a .00004% chance of being correct.
My guess is, Ray Comfort has never considered this. He argues for the existence of his god, but in fact, his god may not, nor ever have, existed. What if the true god is Thor? or Poseidon? Or Ba'al? It matters not how convincing Comfort may be, if his god does not exist his arguments are pointless.
It's irrelevant if Comfort thinks he's crushed an atheist or evolutionist with his "logic"; he still hasn't proven any god exists, and more importantly if true, that HIS god is the true one. Comfort may be arguing for the god of the Bible when, in fact, he should be championing Thor.