- Apognophos: I think I get what you're saying now. I was objecting to what I thought you were implying, which is that he was "dominant", not just "prominent" (noticeable).
Thanks.
I certainly never even thought of implying that Sanderson is "dominant." Not sure why you might have inferred that.
On page one of this thread, Cedars wrote: I'm not convinced Sanderson is receiving disproportionate coverage to other GB members since his appointment.
To which I responded, "It may not be disproportionate, but he certainly is very prominently placed."