250,000 Jehovah's Witnesses have died refusing blood (page 52)

adamah

Nic said- I suppose one of the difference between you and I John is that I don't try to impose MY standards in places where I am only a guest . . .

Cedars said- If your standards involve public naming and shaming rather than resolving grievances in a friendly and amicable way, then I am only too pleased that you and I are different.

Cedars, are you "special pleading" again, demanding to be given permission to insult others who dare to publicly disagree with you (BTW, we're all out of fresh peanuts up here in the peanut gallery)?

Are you engaging in "special pleading" again, as if you special enough to be given the RIGHT to "publicly dispute or argue about a moderator's decision":

Cedars said-

I should add that at least two (maybe more) posters who dared to agree with me over the course of this thread have since been banned. If that isn't evidence of Simon's despotic tendencies, I don't know what is.

Now you're using your imagined "privileged status" to openly insulting the ADMIN?

WOW....

But I'll entertain your hypothesis, so let's conduct a little test:

Adam states publicly that he agrees with Cedars, who said the following back on page 4:

Personally I think it's unfortunate that a figure of 250,000 deaths has been put forward when it cannot be supported by any meaningful data. My approach to criticizing Watchtower is that they are giving us a treasure trove of material already without any need to resort to making stuff up, and damaging our argument in the process.

We'll see if agreeing with you was/is the problem, or if your hypothesis of agreeing causes automatic banning.

I'd be polishing up that "badge of honor" you were claiming you'd wear so proudly, since your legendary Messiah Complex and poor impulse control seems to be kicking in to high gear, and your comments continue to only decrease the signal-to-noise ratio on JWN (which is exactly what the prior two posters you referred to were doing with their OT trolling comments, NOT for publically agreeing with the esteemed Cedars, but for attacking others, even the admin, no less!).

(Admin/mods, feel free to remove this comment, as needed, since it's clearly OT and can be removed without compromising the continuity of the discussion.)

Adam

Simon

Cedars. I am not going to tollerate your continued and repeated attempts to divert topics into the subject of your martyrdom or whatever it is you imagine they should really be about. So, your current outburst and this side-discussion will be removed later today. Everyone can have a chance to read it but it's of no long-term value.

JBD's name was removed from the topic title because she asked me if it could be. No big conspiracy, certainly nothing to do with you.

Also, the old "I will cause a stink, stop posting and then claim I've been deleted" trick. Wow. Haven't seent that one before in the last 14 years ... But new incarnations of previously deleted troll accounts who refuse to abide by the forum rules of course will be prevented from posting. Interesting you claim to know so much about them ... almost like it's all planned and contrived. Is that the new approach AAWA came up with? Claim we're the peanut gallery, sneak on and cause arguments then dissappear so you can claim accounts were deleted and you're being oppressed?

I will not tollerate people games on this site. It's here to support people and provide freedom to ask questions and find answers, not to stroke your inflated ego.

cedars

Wow, the man who banishes anyone who disagrees with him and sanitizes threads of anything that makes him look bad accuses me of having an inflated ego.

Now I really have seen everything.

Cedars

Watchtower-Free

Simon

Wow, the man who banishes anyone who disagrees with him and sanitizes threads of anything that makes him look bad accuses me of having an inflated ego.

LOL, the old gem "I was deleted for disagreeing with Simon" when the reality is people are deleted when they refuse to stick to the rather simple to follow forum guidelines and start to disrupt topics.

I suggest you go have a sit down and think about how you're behaving and whether what you're doing adds any value to this or other topics.

I do not have infinite patience and believe I've already given you plenty of chances. I didn't let you back on the forum after your previous tantrums to derail topics and insult me.

Consider that a final warning.

cedars

I suggest you go have a sit down and think about how you're behaving and whether what you're doing adds any value to this or other topics.

Yes, because I really do spend sooo much time worrying about a forum that isn't moderated and is subject to the whims of a despotic owner, and whether I'm adding enough value to it.

I do not have infinite patience and believe I've already given you plenty of chances. I didn't let you back on the forum after your previous tantrums to derail topics and insult me.

You didn't let me back on the forum at all. I never left. And if your definition of "derail topics and insult me" is "disagree with and contradict me" (as it seems to be) - then yes, I've done that a lot recently. Guilty as charged your honor.

Consider that a final warning.

Oh please go right ahead. I've already said that the way this forum has deteriorated it would be a badge of honor to be banned. Especially since Lee left because she could no longer work with you it is nothing but a meeting place for current and former Witnesses who are willing to either agree with you or stay silent. If you feel the need to silence me on here by banning me, go for it. But I promise you, you won't silence me everywhere, and I think you know that.

Cedars

Simon

Whatever reality makes you happy.

Remember to make sure you copy everything down so you can then make a big fuss when I clear all this shit up.

Oh and Lee no longer being able to work with me was all due to YOU. Step up and take some responsibility for your actions. Everything from AAWA, facebook and on has been your ego-driven teflon-shoulder blaming of others. The first I knew that Lee was unhappy was when she quit publicly - if she wasn't happy with something she chose not to say anything about it.

250,000 Jehovah's Witnesses have died refusing blood

Share this