I have a pretty good idea who should have been invited on the proofreading team.
I wonder what a wiki bible would end up like?
I would have voted for dinosaurs on the end covers. And no messing with voids in Genesis.
by TD 44 Replies latest jw friends
I have a pretty good idea who should have been invited on the proofreading team.
I wonder what a wiki bible would end up like?
I would have voted for dinosaurs on the end covers. And no messing with voids in Genesis.
It kills readability
...as do all the gratuitous accent marks and syllable divisions in the middle of words. It looks like it was meant to make an impression, not to be read.
IGNORE the "Kid's t-shirt" heading... this is in men's sizes
go to http://www.cafepress.com/mf/14857548/kids_tshirt?shop=jaraczicpark
And no messing with voids in Genesis
And no messing with voids in Genesis
HAHAHAHA COOOOOLLL!!!! Sharp indeed!
Jehovahs spirit took a catnap
Besty:
what happened to the 70-step 71-step verification process the GB were boasting about?
Time to change procedure?
Oopsie!
Well spotted, TD!
Have to say, I disagree with Simon and JeffT about right justified text. It irritates me no end when authors of articles or books cannot be bothered to or forget to neatly straighten their text on the right. Having proof-read/edited a few works, this is one of the things I correct first. Right justification looks so much more professional.
Right justification looks so much more professional.
I don't know about the 'professional' part but it is all about looks.
Studies have shown that jagged edged text is better and easier to read.
The almighty Jehovah can move mountains and control the weather to get his book out, but he cant proofread worth a damn!