Whatever conclusions you draw from a Scientific Theory, you are drawing those conclusions based upon details that are incomplete, as I said, the clue is in the name, i.e "Theory".
Please tell that to those who mock, intellectually sneer at, those who DO look at scientific theories and findings with a 'grain of salt'... knowing that they may change.
Because there are some on this board who will do this to any person of faith who does not consider science the end all/know all. In fact, I am not allowed to keep an open mind or doubt science, or even disagree with anything science says... without being accused of holding science in contempt.
Not just me, but others as well... who actually do get excited at new discoveries, etc, and who also respect the scientific process... but who simply do understand that the conclusions can and do change.
What I find objectionable is the kind of intellectual sneer I detect from Tammy, just because "details" are incomplete, we cannot trust our judgements based upon the Theory, whichever one it might be ?
I hope that you can understand what I said to your former point. The sneering is coming from some atheists on this board, toward those who DO know that scientific conclusions are not set in stone, and so science cannot and does not affect their faith.
That is nonsense, there probably does not exist a Theory where all the details are complete, so are we to ignore all Science ?
I have never said that or even implied it. I simply keep an open mind, take conclusions that have not been proven beyond any resaonable doubt, with a grain of salt. So do others, and they are criticized for it. For their faith because their faith does not match the 'current science'... even though the facts in science can change.
Peace,
tammy