New Homo erectus Skull Shakes up Palaeontology

by cofty 192 Replies latest social current

  • braincleaned
    braincleaned

    Science should be welcomed with a measure of healthy skepticism... but I feel that the scientific method is still the best we have, as philosophy can rationalize anything with elitist prose that tricks us humans into feeling intelligent — often, it's empty — and quite impractical for life really...

    A few pearls from Bertrand Russell:

    " Science is what you know, philosophy is what you don't know."

    "I think we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe any philosophy, not even mine."

  • adamah
    adamah

    Cofty said-

    Adam you arrogantly ignored my argument and illustration because I dont have a degree.

    Cofty, I couldn't understand your "argument" (you mean the 'coin in your pocket' thing); it was clear you were as confused as RoseMary on the point. But more importantly, it reinforced that you don't understand that the word 'fact' has a different meaning when used within the scientific circles (AKA a scientific fact) than it does to a layperson, and I'm trying to help you and others see that point with my prior post, and now this one.

    Scientific definition of 'fact'

    (BTW, note that the VERY first definition of "scientific fact" that pops up when Googling IS from Dr Scott's organization, ncse.com:

    http://ncse.com/evolution/education/definitions-fact-theory-law-scientific-work

    Science uses specialized terms that have different meanings than everyday usage. These definitions correspond to the way scientists typically use these terms in the context of their work. Note, especially, that the meaning of “theory” in science is different than the meaning of “theory” in everyday conversation.

    • Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.

    From freedictionary.com:

    Noun 1. scientific fact - an observation that has been confirmed repeatedly and is accepted as true (although its truth is never final)

    In contrast, a non-scientific (laymen's) definition for 'fact' is often suggests more bombastic or dogmatic certainty and unchangability:

    a thing that is indisputably the case. "she lacks political experience—a fact that becomes clear when she appears in public"

    synonyms: reality, actuality, certainty

    1. something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact. 2. something known to exist or to have happened: Space travel is now a fact.

    Cofty said-

    Deal with what people say not who they are.

    And how am I not doing that?

    Unfortunately, what we say often reveals who we are, and our level of education. You certainly don't expect me to apologize for knowing something you don't know, do you? Who's arrogant, again? You didn't get enough of that kind of thing (the arrogance of ignorance, forcing reality to bend to accommodate one's authoritarian dictates) in the JWs, huh?

    See, the thing is I remember repeatedly explaining this very point in threads in which you've participated, but hope springs eternal that this time it might 'stick'. It's not about who's wrong or right, but in were the TRUTH actually lies (that is, unless you still prefer to only believe what you WANT to believe)...

    Adam

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Truth is never final, well said adamah. Finally(!) someone is talking sense around here!

  • The Quiet One
    The Quiet One

    SBF said: " Truth is never final, well said adamah. Finally(!) someone is talking sense around here! "

    ..Is that a fact? ;)

  • cofty
    cofty

    Cofty, I couldn't understand your "argument" (you mean the 'coin in your pocket' thing); it was clear you were as confused as RoseMary on the point.

    Adam - ignoring your sophomoric comments which say more about you than they do about me - Is it a fact that humans have 22 chromosomes or is it a fact that we have 23?

  • adamah
    adamah

    Adam - ignoring your sophomoric comments which say more about you than they do about me - Is it a fact that humans have 22 chromosomes or is it a fact that we have 23?

    (Likewise ignoring your sophomoric comments.....)

    Based on our current understanding, 23. That fact is extremely unlikely to change, but always is a possibility, IF some new supportive evidence is presented to discard prior facts.

    Unlike stone tablets handed down from God, ALL facts and theories in science are potentially subject to modification (or even discarding), if supportive evidence is presented to replace them with those that better fit our observations of reality.

    Adam

  • cofty
    cofty

    So, without resorting to insults and put-downs - is it also a fact that we have 22 chromosomes?

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Adamah,

    " Speciation is not just a light-switch, which is either on or off. Look at the mule/horse/donkey example, where some may be able to produce offspring, but usually the 'hybrids' are sterile.

    Or look at dogs, where even if a chihuahua managed to mate with a great dane by overcoming the differential in physical sizes (!), the fetus may not be viable and/or the chi female may not be able to survive the delivery process. Chihuahuas and Great Danes may in fact becoming separate species, given more time...."

    I am simply quoting the scientific requirements for speciation. For speciation to occur the "original" and the "new" cannot procreate. That is how we know that speciation occured. Unless the requirements for speciation changed since the last time I looked it up.. Horses, mules, lions, tigers.. if they cannot procreate successfully then speciation has occured. A sterile offspring could prove speciation, so could a record of still-births. The point is, they can't successfully mate and continue a lineage. Proving speciation is difficult when the "original" is long dead. It's like "proving" that God does or does not exist. How do you do that? Clone me a hot female H. Erectus, book us a suite at a 5 start hotel. We will see if speciation truly occurred. How else can we really prove it?

    DD

  • cofty
    cofty

    Speciation is not that black-and-white DD

  • braincleaned
    braincleaned

    Shaking my head at the sweeping generalizations on fact and truth. Indeed, much "truth" is not final (or understood) — but some truth is final.
    To rationalize the contrary is mental masturbation, as philosophy often is.

    I would be curious to see how in practical domains of life using philosophy would work...

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit