More recently it is being confirmed, and in some cases rewritten, by comparative genetics.
Yes, It's made for some surprising changes in botanical classification.
by bats in the belfry 41 Replies latest watchtower bible
More recently it is being confirmed, and in some cases rewritten, by comparative genetics.
Yes, It's made for some surprising changes in botanical classification.
I'm finding some of the names used to divide the animal kingdom to be challenging.
My current favourite is the big division between protostomes and deutrostomes - mouth first and mouth second.
It occurred to me that at the most basic every creature is mouth-intestine-anus.
Everything else is secondary.
ETA - Quiz question; What creature has no digestive system?
Tapeworm?
How about all the "kinds" that do not exist today, recorded in the Cambrian layer?
http://www.burgess-shale.bc.ca/discover-burgess-shale/burgess-shale-fossils-and-their-importance
How about all the "kinds" that did not exist then?
Tapeworm? - Jgant
Once anchored to the host's intestinal wall, the tapeworm absorbs nutrients through its skin as the food being digested by the host flows past it and it begins to grow a long tail, with each segment containing an independent digestive system and reproductive tract http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cestoda
Awwww. Snap!
It's gotta be some sort of parasite.
Clue - It applies only to the adult stage of the life cycle
Cicada?
And where exactly does the fearsome crocoduck fit in on that chart?
Cicada?
You are getting close.
Sponges?