.......................................................BROTHER JERAMY`s
.............
I see. So basically I've been "marked," and you, flipper, and OUTLAW are the "judicial committee" who not only have the pulse on every member's trust meter, but are also self-appointed to guard against my "unenlightened viewpoint" (read: apostasy) about whatever it is I decide to discuss here as if there is only one type of opinion permitted in this forum, according to you. Does all that sound just a tad familiar?
The only People with Authority on this forum are Jehovah's Witness.Com Administration..
The Truth Is..
You saw an opportunity to Build a Straw Man...Then Destroy it..
It`s what the WBT$ does....It`s Extremely Dishonest..
(By the way, not a single thing I wrote had anything even remotely to do with "marriage and submissiveness." Not by a long shot. I can absolutely guarantee you that if it had been a man stating the exact same things as Lost his mind stated, my remarks would have been identical to those I gave to her.)
Another Straw Man to divert attention from your agenda here..
You would have supported the JW Spouse regardless of sex..And ..Vilified the Non JW Spouse..
It`s what the WBT$ does....It`s Extremely Dishonest..
Straw man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on false representation of an opponent's argument.[1] To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.
The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.[2][3]