Need help from JW History Buffs

by ILoveTTATT 50 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    I need help with writing an article regarding vaccinations, organ transplants, and blood transfusions.

    I am doing my research using limited amounts of non-WT sources and mostly just the actual WT literature.

    What I am having a hard time understanding is:

    Most of the articles in the Golden Age, at least at the beginning of the anti-vaccination stance, are actually written by contributors. Since there are very pro-vaccination articles and then lots of anti-vaccination articles, how can I determine the actual WT viewpoint on vaccinations?

    Thanks!

  • Terry
    Terry

    The Watch Tower Society publications--according to the leadership--were edited by Jehovah. That's all you need to know.

    According to Fred Franz and Joseph Rutherford the angels were guiding the message.

    You don't need to go any farther than those foundational claims to realize anything which went through the magazines

    HAD TO HAVE BEEN APPROVED first.

    The only person who ever wrote for the magazines who did not have his work checked first (and approved) was Fred Franz.

    When he finally went off the deep end prattling about 1975 that policy changed toward him as well.

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Terry: Thanks, but I want a bit more solid proof that the articles on vaccination were the actual WT viewpoint. Because if it was, then the articles from "G. Del Pino, Glasgow" were very pro-vaccination (similar to modern viewpoints on it). Therefore there was an ambivalent viewpoint.

  • adamah
    adamah

    So you've found examples where the WT follows in the well-worn footsteps of the Bible, shot-gunning ALL possible outcomes which allows them to cherry-pick the 'right' answer after the fact and say, "See, we were right!" while ignoring the contradictory statements that weren't true. They're simply covering their bases, hedging their bets, playing all positions on the craps table, talking out of bot sides of their mouth, etc.

    Many different expressions to say how the Bible (and WT) often relies on the 'Texas sharpshooter' fallacy:

    http://www.fallacyfiles.org/texsharp.html

    Etymology:

    The Texas sharpshooter is a fabled marksman who fires his gun randomly at the side of a barn, then paints a bullseye around the spot where the most bullet holes cluster. The story of this Lone Star state shooter has given its name to a fallacy apparently first described in the field of epidemiology, which studies how cases of disease cluster in a population.

    Adam

  • JakeM2012
    JakeM2012

    For many years witnesses were reluctant to take some vacinations because some of them had blood "fractions". Missionaries were required by the different governements to get vacinations, and were told by WTBTS that if they did not get the vacinations they could not go to their assignments.

    I have seen different periodicals write positive and negative articles about the same subject, when the truth comes out they can point out how they were correct, when actually they just covered their arse.

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Here's my research so far:

    Magazine, Date, Pages, Name of Author (of article), and then I categorized them as Positive/Negative towards vaccination.

    Revista

    Fecha, Páginas

    Nombre del Autor

    Positivo/Negativo?

    Golden Age

    Abril 27, 1921, p. 440-442

    G. Del Pino, Glasgow

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    Julio 20, 1921, p.634-636

    Mrs. W. R. Burzacott

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    September 14, 1921, p. 754

    H.A. Rutschour, D.C.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.8

    A.M. Wilton, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.9

    “Doctor”

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.9-10

    A.M. Wilton, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.10-12

    L.W. Putman, M.D.

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.13-14

    J.J. Wentzel

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.14

    W.M. Pugh

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.15-16

    Mrs. Mary E. Burnet

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.16-17

    A. Murray, M.D.

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921 p.17

    Mrs. R. Walter Maygrove

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 15, 1922 p.314

    G. Del Pino

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    January 3, 1923, p.211-214

    Mrs. Andrew J. Holmes

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 17, 1923, p.240-244

    Walter H. Hadwen, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 17, 1923, p.244-245

    Walter F. Moser

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 7, 1923, p.80

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 7, 1923, p.87

    F.R. Freer

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 30, 1924 p.687

    Isaac L. Peebles, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924, p.17

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924 p.18

    Geo F. Herde

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924 p.18

    London Daily News

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 28, 1925, p.266

    Doctors H.M. Shelton and B. Stanford Claunch

    Negativo

    I want to know when it turned from a debate written out in the pages of the Golden Age to actually being the official WT position on it.

  • alanv
    alanv

    The Golden Age 1931, February 4 issue devoted 10 pages to why vaccinations were not for Christians. The index page to the 1931 article claimed this as the viewpoint of the Creator.

    Does not get much clearer than that..

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Thank you! That's what I needed... So before it was a debate on vaccination, then later the anti-vaccination stance became the viewpoint of the editor, and then of the WT...

    Thanks alanv!

  • adamah
    adamah

    That's funny, for what need does Jehovah, the omniscient being who some believe created humanity, have for human debate over vaccinations? What concern could he possibly have for the opinions of "flawed" mortals and doctors? Doesn't he KNOW if He approves or not?

    Of course, non-prescient HUMANS end up on the wrong sides of issues (eg blood transfusions, vaccinations, organ transplants), not omniscient beings.

    Adam

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Adam: I am doing it this way just to cover MY a$$ on this... I want to "make TTATT my own" and want to counter the following JW apologist article:

    http://defendingjehovahswitnesses.blogspot.ca/2011/11/vaccinations-vaccines.html

    Also JWFact's article might be only "technically correct" on its article on vaccinations:

    http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/medical.php#vaccinations

    The quote below from the Golden Age is technically "information against vaccinations." But the article was written by Mrs. R. Walter Maygrove and it is a bit unclear whether AT THIS POINT the article was the "official WT policy"... since her article was in response to the April 27, 1921 article which was VERY positive towards vaccinations.


    "Vaccination never prevented anything and never will, and is the most barbarous practice...We are in the last days; and the devil is slowly losing his hold, making a strenuous effort meanwhile to do all the damage he can, and to his credit can such evils be placed. ... Use your rights as American citizens to forever abolish the devilish practice of vaccinations."Golden Age 1921 Oct 12 p.17

    I just want to be a bit more precise in the history...

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit