Need help from JW History Buffs

by ILoveTTATT 50 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    You need a statement from the WT stating so. It is not enough to guess or to surmise.

    Totally agree with you 100%... I still have to find something that says something like, "if it is here it is endorsed"...

    This is JUST to close the loop of the apologists... just so that they are completely silenced and cannot have a chance at calling the apostates liars.

    If this statement cannot be found, however, it is evident by the sheer amount of negative articles at the beginning, and then more and more assertive articles later on, up to the 1931 article, that the WT was decidedly anti-vaccination back then.

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    It seems like the cuckoo magazines from which a lot of the articles against vaccination and against medicine in the Golden Age came from is still alive...

    http://www.getwellstaywellamerica.com/index.htm

    http://www.getwellstaywellamerica.com/Shelton/SheltonTimelinePg3.htm - mentions the "How To Live" Magazine and G.R. Clements

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    I finally got to the February 4th, 1931 article.

    They connected vaccination with bestiality... and DONE... wrong for Christians...

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    I need to apologize to Paul (jwfacts)... I just wanted proof that if it was included in the Golden Age, it was endorsed. I have not really found a direct proof of this, but I have indirect ones (the last one might be called a direct one, imho):

    1. Christmas was abolished for JW's using an article that appeared in the Golden Age. They mentioned the author's name, but that didn't mean that it was taken as the personal opinion of the author, it was made binding on all Bible Students / JW's...

    2. The amount of negative viewpoints towards vaccinations far exceeds the number of positive ones. We are talking around 85% negative vs 15% positive... the positive ones were only at the beginning of the articles, but after 1925, all of the articles that dealt with vaccination were negative.

    3. The very first article of the Golden Age, the introductory one, explained that the magazine was "backed by some of the best and ablest men in the world and shall be maintained as an educational medium for the purpose of explaining the true relationship between science, agriculture, labor and pure religion" (Golden Age, October 1st, 1919, p.3)

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    This is my list of references, so far: (I want to get up to 1952, then fast forward to 1993 and 1996)

    Revista

    Fecha, Páginas

    Nombre del Autor

    Positivo/Negativo?

    Golden Age

    Abril 27, 1921, p. 440-442

    G. Del Pino, Glasgow

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    Julio 20, 1921, p.634-636

    Mrs. W. R. Burzacott

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    September 14, 1921, p. 754

    H.A. Rutschour, D.C.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.8

    A.M. Wilton, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.9

    “Doctor”

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.9-10

    A.M. Wilton, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.10-12

    L.W. Putman, M.D.

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.13-14

    J.J. Wentzel

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.14

    W.M. Pugh

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.15-16

    Mrs. Mary E. Burnet

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921, p.16-17

    A. Murray, M.D.

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    October 12, 1921 p.17

    Mrs. R. Walter Maygrove

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 15, 1922 p.314

    G. Del Pino

    Positivo

    Golden Age

    January 3, 1923, p.211-214

    Mrs. Andrew J. Holmes

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 17, 1923, p.240-244

    Walter H. Hadwen, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 17, 1923, p.244-245

    Walter F. Moser

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 7, 1923, p.80

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 7, 1923, p.87

    F.R. Freer

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 30, 1924 p.687

    Isaac L. Peebles, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924, p.17

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924 p.18

    Geo F. Herde

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 8, 1924 p.18

    London Daily News

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 28, 1925, p.266

    Doctors H.M. Shelton and B. Stanford Claunch

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 11, 1925, p.373

    F.P. Millard, D.O.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 22, 1925, p.451-455

    Dr. R. A. Gamble

    Positivo (Confiamos en el Dr…. Electronic Radio Biola)

    Golden Age

    March 24, 1926, p.397

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    August 25, 1926, p.749-754

    F.L. Wilson

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    September 8, 1926, p.792-796

    G.R. Clements

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 20, 1926 p.41

    General

    Ambiguo

    Golden Age

    August 10, 1927, p.712

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    August 24, 1927, p.749-750

    General (“Contribuído)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 11, 1928, p.237

    General

    Negativo (y con dibujos/fotografías)

    Golden Age

    April 4, 1928, p.425

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 25, 1928, p. 695

    G.W. Emery

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 28, 1928, p.147

    Dr. B.H. Jones

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 23, 1929, p.260

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 6, 1929 p.301

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 3, 1929, p. 430, 431

    General / Reprinted – Dr. George R. Clements

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 17, 1929, p.467-468

    Herbert M. Shelton

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    May 1, 1929, p. 502-503

    General / Reprinted – Dr. H. R. Rickards

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 24, 1929 p. 691-692

    General / Reprinted – Dr. George R. Clements

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 24, 1929, p. 692

    General *(First article explicitly stating it was THEIR view)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 16, 1929, p.47-48

    General / Reprinted – Dr. George R. Clements

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    October 16, 1929, p.48

    Tenison Diane, M.D. (Editor agrees)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 8. 1930, p.240-242

    F.R. Freer (England)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 5, 1930, p.299

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 19, 1930, p.341

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 2, 1930, p. 427-429

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 2, 1930, p. 439-440

    Frank W. Rogers (New Jersey)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 9, 1930, p.653

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 23, 1930, p.688

    General / Wilbur J. Murphy, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    August 6, 1930 p.707-713

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    September 17, 1930, p. 814

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 12, 1930 p.119

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    November 26, 1930 p.150

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    January 21, 1931, p.270

    Dr. P. L. Clark (Illinois)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 4, 1931 p.291-293

    General *(This article made it wrong for Christians)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 4, 1931 p.293-295

    Charles A. Patillo, VA

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 4, 1931 p.295-300

    H. Sillaway (Tennessee)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 18, 1931 p.328

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    April 1, 1931, p.436

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    June 10, 1931, p.587

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 8, 1931 p.651

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    July 22 1931, p.693-694

    Dr. P.L. Clark

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    August 19, 1931, p.749

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    August 19, 1931, p.754-755

    General / Reprinted from The Quest

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    December 9, 1931, p.147-148

    Louis S. Sigfried * (Real vaccination disaster)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    February 3, 1932, p.273

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 16, 1932, p.374

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 16, 1932, p.375

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 30, 1932, p. 407

    Emmanuel M. Josephson, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 30, 1932, p. 408

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 30, 1932, p. 408

    Martin Friedrich, M.D.

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 30, 1932, p.409

    General / William C. Ostander (Famous drawing)

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 30, 1932, p.410

    General

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    June 22, 1932, p.601-602

    Albert W. Peacock

    Negativo

    Golden Age

    March 15, 1933, p.370

    General / R.W. Lamson, Ph.D.

    Negativo

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Interesting results, thanks for the research. I hadn't realized that the org. was once undecided on the subject, though I shouldn't be surprised since they were the same way with blood transfusions.

  • outsmartthesystem
    outsmartthesystem

    "The Watch Tower Society publications--according to the leadership--were edited by Jehovah. That's all you need to know."

    Bingo. It doesn't matter who wrote it so long as Jehovah put his stamp of approval on it through his faithful slave by publishing it.

  • outsmartthesystem
    outsmartthesystem

    If your opposition is going to claim that said articles aren't really the WT's true feelings on the matter simply because they were written by contributors.......then can't they claim something similar today? If you were to point out a contradiction of ideas or teachings from one magazine to the next, what is to stop an apologist from saying "well....THAT particular article is merely written by someone in the writing department that had a personal agenda.....therefore it does not reflect the TRUE position of the WT on the matter."?

    If the apologist is going to claim that an article that was published by God's Faithful Slave should not be scrutinized because it MAY not have contained the Faithful Slave's true feelings on the matter........then what articles throughout the history of their existence can we trust DID accurately represent their true feelings?

  • ILoveTTATT
    ILoveTTATT

    Now I found this gem (the gem is in the Spanish version of this):

    The "bona fide objection to vaccination" part, in Spanish, actually says "Christian Scientists or Jehovah's Witnesses"

    Can someone help me find the actual laws that state that a person HAS to be a JW/Christian Scientist to be able to qualify as a religios exemption to vaccinations?

    The more explicit, the better! Please help me to find a website...

    THANKS!

    The English version:

    http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/vaccination-exemptions

    Religious Exemptions

    Forty-eight states allow exemptions to vaccination for religious reasons. Some states statutes indicate that to receive a religious exemption, a family must belong to a religious group with bona fide objections to vaccination. They may, as Iowa does, ask a parent to attest that "immunization conflicts with a genuine and sincere religious belief and that the belief is in fact religious, and not based merely on philosophical, scientific, moral, personal, or medical opposition to immunizations." Other states simply require that a parent sign a form stating that he or she has religious objections to vaccination.

    Several legal cases involving the constitutionality of religious exemptions to vaccination have been tried. The rulings have in general upheld the right of states to mandate vaccination in spite of parents’ religious beliefs. At the same time, courts have often found that requiring parents belong to certain religious groups to qualify for religious exemptions violates the Constitution’s Equal Protection clause. The argument is that the Equal Protection clause should protect all people who claim a religious objection to vaccination, not only those who belong to a certain religion with recognized objections.

    The Spanish Version:

    http://www.historyofvaccines.org/es/contenido/articulos/exenciones-la-vacunaci%C3%B3n

    Exenciones religiosas

    Cuarenta y ocho estados permiten exenciones por razones religiosas. Algunos estados requieren que una familia pertenezca a un grupo religioso en particular que desaliente o normalmente decline la vacunación, como los Científicos Cristianos o los testigos de Jehová. Otros estados requieren que un padre de familia firme una declaración jurada en la que se exponen las objeciones religiosas contra la vacunación.

    Se ha intentado plantear varios casos legales donde se arguye la constitucionalidad de las exenciones religiosas a la vacunación. En general, los fallos han respetado el derecho de los estados a obligar la vacunación, a pesar de las creencias religiosas de los padres. Al mismo tiempo, con frecuencia los tribunales han descubierto que pedir a los padres a que pertenezcan a ciertos grupos religiosos para validar las exenciones religiosas transgrede la cláusula de protección equitativa establecida por la constitución. El argumento es que la cláusula de protección equitativa debe proteger a toda la gente que reclama una objeción religiosa a la vacunación, no sólo a quienes pertenecen a unas cuantas religiones con objeciones reconocidas.

  • ILoveTTATT

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit