Thanks Seedy!
Well, I couldn't let this one go! Here's what the Insight book says about the Numbers 13:33 scripture:
Insight Book 1 929"The faithless spies reported to the Israelites that in Canaan they "saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who are from the Nephilim; so that we became in our own eyes like grasshoppers, and the same way we became in their eyes." (Numbers 13:33) These men of extraordinary size, called the sons of Anak (probably meaning "Long-Necked [that is, of tall stature]"), were not actually Nephilim, as reported, but were only unusually tall men, for the Nephilim, the offspring of angels and women (Genesis 6:4), perished in the Flood."
Insight Book 2 Page 493Did the spies deliberately lie about this sighting of the Nephilim to be mischievous? Or did they genuinely think that this was the case?"No doubt there were some large men in Canaan, as other scriptures show, but never except in this "bad report," which was carefully couched in language designed to strike terror and cause panic among the Israelites, are they called Nephilim."
Was it just their imagination playing tricks? Was it that they just saw some unusually big dudes hanging around Canaan?
Nephilim are pretty unmistakable – not only to look at, but also with their behavior. Did the bible writer expect us to know that they weren't really Nephilim, or was he a bit confused over his own chronology? This was supposedly the same writer (Moses) that wrote the Genesis account – you would have expected him to elucidate a bit more here to save confusion.
The FDS have an answer for everything, not always a satisfactory answer, but an answer nonetheless! I wonder how many other bible accounts can be explained away by the "Oh, they must have been mistaken / Oh, they must have been lying" tack?