Shirley said- You lost all credibility (if you has any to begin with) when you made it crystal clear you play dumb just to pick fights and keep them going. You are so self-contradictory it's dizzying, and, coupled with your constant disingenous flip flopping, anything you say is just so much bovine residue. I've scraped you from my shoes and have moved on.
It should be trivial to prove it: give ONE example to back up your conclusion, since the most-basic principle of skepticism is to accept premises (allegations) which are backed up by verifiable evidence, only.
Until you do, the assumption remains you're talking smack (shot-gunning groundless accusations) to distract readers that you're out of facts, but want to protect your cherished beliefs even DESPITE evidence to the contrary. You have your conclusion already in mind (an analog to the JWs, "these endtimes are getting soooo baddd!"), so let the counter-evidence be damned.
On this:
Shirley said- Post your long-winded nonsensical diatribes if it makes you feel better, but I won't read them.
Hmmm, that sounds suspiciously like a JW discouraged from reading apostate literature, in the name of 'protecting their faith' (it's actually called 'dogmatism' in other arenas). You still 'protecting your faith', except for your current cherished dogma?
The beliefs everyone MOST should be questioning are those they most WANT to be true, since that's what leads to dogmatism and confirmation biases. The fact you see the questioning process (the willingness to examine the other side) speaks spades, since that's the rationalist's approach. It's why debate teams argue BOTH sides of the case: it forces one to not get in a mental rut.
To address a point raised a few pages back about last years "new light" on FDS and "anointed class":
The anointed class has never been officially recognized as exerting any influence over the GB to help out with 'spiritual feeding'; to the contrary, any attempts to organize such groups has resulted in such 'annointed ones' being slapped down, with some DFed for apostacy for getting too big for the britches.
The whole 'anointed class' thing has been a paper tiger, only, giving some the ability to feel better than the hoi polloi in the KH to attempt to exert power locally, but largely pointless (since $3.95 and claiming to be anointed will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks, but only if you have $3.95. One 80 y.o. senile bitty in the KH claimed to be anointed, but then (1960's era) as now, the elders rolled their eyes when she tried to exert any influence over them.)
So the recent moves to officially disassociate the 'annointed class' from the FDS are symbolic, only (esp since members of the GB claim to be anointed, eg Sanderson, thus offering the appearance of annointed representation on the GB). Since there's no channel to exert control, it's not an actual change in power or authority, since the 'annointed class' cannot lose authority or representation they never even had.
To add to the 'less-authoritarian' column, I don't think there's ANYTHING that matches the example of Rutherford's smear camaign and public character assassination of the reputation of Olin Moyle (a lawyer who worked as general counsel for Society matters), carried out in the pages of the WT for all to see (Moyle later sued WTBTS for libel, and won his case).
Leolaia wrote a lengthy thread on the story last year, showing the bald-faced arrogance of a man drunk on not just booze, but his sole authority and power, proven in the way he responded to any perceived challenges to his limitless power:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/scandals/239384/1/Rutherfords-smear-campaign-a-must-read#.UvkQTl5kIRs