Fulltimestudent,
I don't think anyone here has a problem with JWs and the simple drinking that most cultures allow. It's the drunkeness part that gets the criticism. This was clearly condemned in the same green Bible I grew up with right next to "fornication". Rutherford was a known drunk, not just a drinker. He wasn't just a Joe Schmo Witness dude; he was the leader of the entire religion for Heaven's sake!
For example they used to read me this scripture as a child: 1 Corinthians 6: 9,10, says: "Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God."
Interestingly, in the 35 years I was a Witness, I would see JWs get drunk from time to time at a party or get together, but as long as nobody complained about it and these people didn't get drunk too often, NOTHING WOULD HAPPEN TO THEM! Nada. Zilch.
I saw Bethelites when I was there get drunk from time to time AND NOTHING WOULD HAPPEN TO THEM EITHER! AT GOD'S HOUSE MIND YOU! Nada. Zilch.
So, no JW elder would think to label a person a drunkard for "an occasional mistake" of drinking too much. It happens after all. Let it go. We're human after all. It's natural to make mistakes like this. Boo hoo.
But, should that same person commit fornication just one time, they would be dragged into the back room for a comittee meeting so quick it would make your head snap. Fornicate two times and you were an unrepentant sinner and disfellowshipped - period. Game over. You would be whispered about as a pervert for the rest of your life too.
I guess sex isn't natural?
Hypocrisy in it's purest form.
Brock Talon