Jehovah's Witnesses have always been a fringe, anti-intellectual movement, almost by definition. There is nothing new about faddish health concerns, attitudes that ignore history and science or even beliefs that defy common sense ( false prophecy for what, 130+ years?). However, there are two differences with JW's of the past that will prove critical for the survival of the Organization today.
1) Poor financial conditions - in the past, it was possible to hold all sorts of nonsensical beliefs and still be a functional member of the human race, generally. That however, has changed with the decline in middle class jobs and bank accounts. Good paying factory jobs in particular are gone.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/03/26-6
The above is a rather biased account of how dependent Walmart has become on welfare payments. I post this as evidence of a powerful change in the US towards dependence and poverty. Since most Witnesses are middle or lower class, it's going to hurt the Organization. This is a big reason why many publishers can't afford to stay overnight and attend assemblies. They're just broke.
2) More Chronic illness - I have no general survey of Witnesses to cite here but there is good evidence that middle and lower class people are increasingly subject to chronic health concerns - such as obesity, diabetes and worse. If they can't afford health insurance, this may guarantee a life of debt and expense. Note: this is not the same as a general worsening of public health - we aren't subject to a great many infectious illnesses of the past for example but chronic dependence on prescription drugs or medical treatments is a major problem ( and expense)
For the Governing Body, the above is a two-edged sword. Many Witnesses will likely remain ever dependent on the "Armageddon Soon" hope because they have nothing else to hope for, struggling from day to day. OTOH, it means that the WTS is accumulating ever greater numbers of weak, dependent people with empty wallets and fragile health. It also puts pressure on them as to leadership as fewer men can afford to 'reach out' in practical terms.
I assert that these trends will haunt the Governing Body: "What are we doing? Gathering more feeble people and to what end?". It also has the effect of limiting their options because former resources of competent people or money can't be counted on.
These trends are also worrisome to what few discerning elders remain as private conversations with many suggest ( " Is there anyone 'normal' in our congregation anymore?')
metatron