@FlyingHighNow:
"MeanMM, I don't think you asked me that for the reason of not knowing the answer."
Most likely true. But, I don't see anything inherently wrong with being "big". How one becomes "big", on the other hand, does matter. I am not sure if you are picking on being "big" in general. Not all companies get "big" through government favors. If you get there through the free market, then I don't see anything wrong with it.
I suggest reading this book:
Critical Condition: How Health Care in America Became Big Business--and Bad Medicine
http://www.amazon.com/Critical-Condition-America-Business-Medicine-ebook/dp/B000FC2IQM
Here is part of the Prologue:
Agreed - the system is rigged, but the problem is not with the market. The type of shenanigans described in this open paragraph isn't produced by a true market. The very fact that the author claims patients 'do not have a choice' should clue you in that something is wrong - after all, the very definition of a market is competition among a multitude of vendors. Now if that is what you mean by "big business", then I can stand with you. What you really mean, then, is business that has a competitive edge through lobbying, legislation, and state intervention into the market. ACA is more the same.
MMM