Are ex-jw who are angry potential . . .

by mystikool 45 Replies latest jw friends

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    Eh, mon cheri, you likka ze accent, no?

    We from ze Euroweenie village of Azzwipe, you know? I am village idiot there; very impotent man!

    So sorry, muzt go - time for Siestafestivus.

    "We are not a crackpot."

  • accuracy
    accuracy
    In the last six months, 9 Jehovah's Witness children have met their deaths by murder. At the hands of their primary caregivers.

    You got verification for that, or are we just supposed to believe it because you said it?

    Hello, Mystikool. Greetings from one mystic (Master Adept) to another.

  • singsongboi
    singsongboi

    dear mysticool,

    you are quite wrong to think that jws, will never do anything wrong..

    the cult of blind obedience!!!
    the teaching ..better to be wrong inside the organisation, than right outside!!

    heard all that stuff, havn't you... in my near 40 years inside as a faithfull little dub, i heard all that often.. that it is wrong to think for yourself..

    in australia - my country - (see, i doan have to hide) in the 1930s, and early 1940's many did wrong things because a corrupt branch told them to.

    the conditions have been bred for that to happen in many other places.. i am not seeing something sinister in that.. just that this 'unreasoning' acceptance of obedience', the attitude of book-burning to get rid of possiblities of people reasoning for themselves, breed the conditions that can lead to excess...

  • 144thousand_and_one
    144thousand_and_one
    Hello, Mystikool. Greetings from one mystic (Master Adept) to another.

    Mystic? I think the appropriate term is "jackass."

  • raven101
    raven101

    Maybe 'he's' from ganja country where nobody is angry . . . everybody is just laaaaaaiiiiiiiiiid . . . baaaaaaaaaaaccccccck . . . ?

    raven101

  • Robdar
    Robdar

    Mystikool,

    You said "No loyal jw would obey this "new light" you talk about. We believe that we should obey God rather than man."

    Sorry to disagree with ya, bud. The reason I left the WT is because one night during KMS, an elder told the congregation that complete faith in Jehovah's organization was required. That included jumping off the bridge if the WTS told us to.

    Huh? Thanks but no thanks. That was when I realised that the organization was trying to brain-wash me.

    This wasn't long after the disaster at Jonestown Guyana. Rember Jim Jones and the poison kool aid?

    I still thank God for the excellent Bullshit detector he gave me.

    I recently mentioned what that elder said to a current JW acquaintance of mine in Canada. He agreed that most JW's would do whatever the WTS said including going to Madagascar to meet the UFO's if that is what the society wanted. He said, who is to say what Jehovah will want us to do when the end comes? Only the organization knows and we must be obedient to the faithful and discreet slave.

    JW's are more brain-washed than your typical Moonie.

    I really don't know why I am feeding a troll......

    Love,
    Robyn

    PS. The mystics I know do not get on a public opinion forum and brag about being mystics.

  • Beans
  • mystikool
    mystikool

    :Mistic,

    Why do you keep saying "we"?

    Do you have multiple personalities, are you possessed or is there someone there with you helping you post?:

    The "we" is ambiguous. It could be used to refer to one person or two. We will let you decide how we are using it.

    RedhorseWoman

    :Hmmmm..."we" seem to be getting a little paranoid, don't "we"?:

    There is no paranoia, dear. Since "we" came to this board, people have tried to figure out who "we" are. Kent what's-his-namey always has tried to out loyal witness on the board in this place. So has AlanF. Some people even think that Hilda is Dunnn Scot. Any historian could tell you that Hilda and Dunnn Scot are two different people. Study your mystics.

  • mystikool
    mystikool

    :Mystikool, your not a therapists by the way, are you?:

    No I am not.

    :Have you ever gotten mad and said a cuss word?:

    You bet.

    :What experience do have in life? Are you married and have a family?:

    My personal life is not what is at issue in this place.

    :Do you know why the people on this forum are 'venting?' If you do, please tell it to me in one sentence and I mean one sentence.:

    Nobody is venting here. There is lots of enablement of repressed anger going on this place. Excuse my Engrish.

  • seedy3
    seedy3

    Mystikool.

    Ef you do nod tink dat de JW's will do rongs, in da name of de church den pleze tell me abut de idea dat et is wrong to lie in deir church, yet et es ok to lie to de rest of da world for da church. I refer to da Theocratic Warefare, woud dat be any different den if dey said to kill in da name of da church?? Jw's will follow blindly if de governing body said et was oke and da right ting to do.

    Posted tounge in cheek.. LMAO

    Seedy

    P.S. The fake accient was for you Bobsgirl

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit