Changes in DF reporting

by fader77 22 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • fader77
    fader77

    TO ALL BODIES OF ELDERS

    Re: Notification of Disfellowshipping or Disassociation

    Dear Brothers:

    This is to inform you that a revised Notification of Disfellowshipping or Disassociation

    (S-77) form has been prepared. Please note the following significant adjustments from the previous

    version of the form:

     In most cases, it will not be necessary to provide a summary of the case. If anything of

    significance regarding the case needs to be shared with the branch office, it should be

    provided in a separate letter. If an individual appeals a judicial decision, a brief summary

    should be sent to the Service Department only when (1) the two committees disagree or

    (2) the individual does not accept the decision.

     It will no longer be necessary to provide the individual’s judicial history.

     It will no longer be necessary for the committee members to sign the form. Rather, their

    names should simply be entered in the appropriate fields.

     The branch office will no longer return a copy of the S-77 form to the congregation.

     On reinstatement, the chairman of the committee should write the date of reinstatement

    on the congregation’s copy of the S-77 form. He should then send a message to

    the Service Department including the person’s (1) full name; (2) date of birth; and (3)

    date of baptism; along with (4) the date the reinstatement was announced. (The S-77

    form itself should not be sent.) The same information should be provided by a member

    of the committee if the individual dies, except that the date of death should be

    provided rather than the date of reinstatement.

    In view of the adjustments described in this letter, each elder should make the following notations

    in his copy of the Shepherding textbook:

     In chapter 8, paragraph 10, cross out the last two sentences and write in the margin: “If

    the original committee agrees with the new grounds, they should adjust the S-77

    form, announce the disfellowshipping, and submit the form to the branch office. The

    appeal committee’s brief summary should be retained in the confidential file along

    with a copy of the S-77 form and the brief summary of the original committee.”

     In chapter 8, paragraph 13, cross out the existing sentences and replace with the following:

    “The original committee should submit the completed S-77 form to the branch office.

    The appeal committee’s brief summary should be retained in the confidential

    file along with a copy of the S-77 form and the brief summary of the original committee.”

     In chapter 8, paragraph 18, cross out the last four sentences and write in the margin: “On

    the other hand, if both committees now agree not to disfellowship the individual, the appeal

    committee should inform him of the final decision in the presence of the judicial

    Re: Notification of Disfellowshipping or Disassociation

    June 26, 2014

    Page 2

    committee. The appeal committee’s brief summary should be retained in the confidential

    file along with the brief summary of the original committee.”

  • wokeup
    wokeup

    This has their Legal dept. written all over it.

  • sparrowdown
    sparrowdown

    So you remain DS/DA after your dead? So much for "the wages sin pays is ..." and all that.

    There's no tyranny like petty tyranny.

  • Billy the Ex-Bethelite
    Billy the Ex-Bethelite

    The branch gets so many DF and DA forms that nobody has time to read them or look at the signatures. A CO that attended the school for travelling overseers told me that his work assignment in service department was to read and file the incoming DF/DA forms. He said how overwhelming and depressing it was. They have drawers and drawers full of that kind of paperwork.

    I wish I had a stack of those new forms and special blue envelopes. Would love to fill some out and mail them in.

  • kneehighmiah
    kneehighmiah

    This is grade A plausible deniability. Now the branch can say they don't know anything about the bad things that go on in the congregation. They can be held responsible for anything they don't know about. Also I find it interesting that they are instructed not to sign the forms.

  • AndDontCallMeShirley
    AndDontCallMeShirley

    kneehigh: This is grade A plausible deniability.

    Yet another way to hang the fallout from WT's policies around the neck of elders.

    Get rid of DO's, make the CO responsible for appointing elders, then WT takes a hands-off approach to all proceedings as if the elders are solely responsible for anything that goes sideways.

  • villagegirl
    villagegirl

    Exactly as ADCMS says. They demand obedience and blame

    you if you obey and claim their instructions had nothing to

    do with them at all. But if you don't obey you are marked, shunned

    and called an apostate. You are damned if you do and damned if you don't.

  • baltar447
    baltar447

    Maybe some elders will figure out that they're being hung out to dry.

  • Witness My Fury
    Witness My Fury

    As said already: plausible deniability.

  • HeyThere
    HeyThere

    I agree this is so they can claim ignorance and deny deny deny. The law suit situation must be heating up. A copy of this letter should be sent to all governments with any active or pending case/inquiries.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit