My Elderette returns for a final Bible Study session, after I avoided her for 2 months (very long post)

by Faithful Witness 42 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Faithful Witness
    Faithful Witness

    Some of this will be repeat, since it's been a little while since I posted about my "Bible Study" sessions with Miss K, my elderette.

    First, a little history and a few important points: I HAVE NEVER BEEN A JW. I was a Bible Student for about 3 years (on and off). I was a very slow study, and I was never quite convinced. When my husband and I discovered some information about the history of the Watchtower Society, we asked questions of our (then) study conductor. The 77-year old born-in JW, sat there and lied, denied and made quite an emotional display, in his reaction to the "apostate" information we were asking him about. After that, we ended our study and stopped attending meetings. We were not going to fake it, just so we could enjoy the fellowship at the Kingdom Hall.

    Sadly, my parents and my sister (and her entire family, 2 kids, husband) were studying in a different town, at a more progressive rate. They were already baptized by the time we quit studying. My brother in law accused me of "turning my back on Jehovah," and soon after that, they decided that they had to "protect their children from the apostasy and idolatry" in our home. Now, our family has been torn into pieces by the JW cult... just as my mother (now baptized) predicted, before she started studying with the JW's.

    It's been about 2 years, since I brought this issue to the forefront with the entire family (most are non-JW, don't want to hear about it), when we were trying to arrange our annual reunion. Everything hit the fan, and I have pretty much lost hope of ever reconnecting with my JW sister. She has been absorbed into the cult. My parents still speak to me, and my mother (a weak JW, who shows clear signs of confusion) continues to speak to me and visit us occasionally.

    ===========

    Anyway... JW's continue to call on us sometimes. We live on the border of 2 territories, so we get calls from the local KH, and from the one we actually attended (although more rare, as they have pretty much figured it out and marked us... they still stop by once or twice a year to check in on us). We were love-bombed at the meetings, and they adored our young children. (Thankfully, the kids have no memory of the meetings or being inside a KH!!)

    When JW's come to my door (they seem to be atracted to me), I ask them questions that could never be answered by our teacher, and express concerns that I have about how Watchtower conflicts with the Bible and what Jesus taught. For lack of a better term, I like to play "Stump the Witness," in hopes of getting them to think for themselves, or possibly flip a switch that will someday turn on a light in their own mind. I have no dillusions that I am going to "lead someone to the Lord" in one conversation... but I am not shy about casting doubt on the JW organization itself. They claim to be representing God, so they should be able to stand up to scrutiny.

    ============

    5 months ago, in March of this year, I began a discussion with a JW from our former KH. She was an acquaintance, an elderette, whose husband was one of the major players at the KH. We never knew titles or positions there, but he was usually acting as the hall monitor. There had been a few times, when he reminded me to keep my babies from disrupting the meetings. I spent most of my time in the mother's room, nursing my son, or walking the hallway with a restless baby. Both of them always had a bit of a "better than you are" type attitude, but not every personality is the same. We just never clicked or socialized.

    My elderette, I will call her Miss K, worked on me slowly at first, and finally got me to agree to restart my Bible Study. You can look at my history and see blow-by-blow accounts of the discussions we have had over the past few months. Since she was the first JW to actually come back, despite my challenging questions, I kept talking to her. She had convinced herself that she was going to somehow "help me" see things from a perspective that made me believe that the JW's HAVE THE TRUTH.

    Each visit, she would come and make claims or try to answer my questions. My first question was about the faithful and discreet slave. (Fail - see previous post... she did not have evidence or the answer to that question, so she put it on the shelf)

    I also asked about why they believe they can work their way to salvation, and turn in time cards, reporting their efforts to men for recognition. (Fail)

    Miss K kept repeating the same mantra: "I know we have the TRUTH." and "I have come here to show you what the Bible teaches."

    After avoiding it for several meetings, we ended up agreeing to use the Bible Teach book again, because she believed that it would help me to just start over at the beginning. I was not ready for the complicated truth, because I "did not know enough," you have to "build a foundation before you can build a house," and (yes she did) "You are a kindergartener." So... I found my old copy, which I had finished studying with the previous teacher.

    (I shocked myself, by what I found highlighted in this book. !!! I know I was trying to believe it at the time, but I had managed to find and highlight the most bizarre and condescending, mind-controlling statements in this little book. Wow! I am so glad I never joined this cult!)

    I had asked her why JW's were so fixated on calling God by the name Jehovah, even though it was a mispronunciation. Miss K thought that using this book, was going to help me "understand." Instead, I just found it insulting to read this condescending rhetoric. It's supposed to be from the Bible, but the whole point seemed to be, that "if YOUR Bible does not say Jehovah 6,000 times, then you need one that does."

    We read the first chapter of Bible Teach together, and then we were gearing up to talk more about the name. I went on vacation, she went on vacation, summer happened, and I managed to postpone our meeting for 2 months. She finally came over yesterday, with a new partner.

    ============ Latest meeting - finally, the point

    She was surprised to see that I also had a friend with me, Diana, an evangelical Christian who has compassion for people who are trapped in cults like JW's and LDS. I had told Miss K a little bit about Diana before, and Diana has been filled in on all the details of my meetings with Miss K. Miss K had a friend with her, that I had never met until last week, when they came over to see if they could pin me down for another BS session.

    So, we sat down, and I informed Miss K that I had a real time limit this time. I had 90 minutes, and I had to leave. She went right into her introduction, explaining how we were going to be using the Bible Teach book, and that our goal was to discuss the divine name of Jehovah, and why we are supposed to use it.

    Miss K explained how the Bible Teach book was a good tool, to build a foundation and gain understanding of what the Bible really says. Diana asked why they needed a book to explain the Bible. Miss K repeated herself, and tried to explain that it was a step-by-step process... you can't understand the complex issues, until you grasp the basic ones ("just like in math... you can't do calculus, unless you know how to add and subtract"). *eyeroll from Diana.

    (=#= Real world translation: "You won't believe what the Watchtower says, until you learn to think like the Watchtower tells you to think" =#=)

    Step 1. Miss K explains that we all must agree that the Bible is the true and accurate word of God. We agree and move on. She reads paragraph 5 from Bible Teach, and we discuss how we have to keep "asking, seeking and knocking... you have to keep searching, and then you will find the answers."

    Step 1 complete. Bible is true.

    -- Miss K took a few minutes to talk about why Jesus came to the earth, and we all agreed that he never sinned or lied. We also read some verses about how you must not add anything to the scriptures, nor take anything away...

    Step 2. Who is God? Do you want to be close to God? What is his name? --

    Instead of going on to paragraph 6 in the book, we start talking about how God has a name. That's when the discussion gets more heated and interesting. Miss K says, "You asked me to show you where in the Bible, it shows Jesus calling God by the name Jehovah." We read a passage, in which Jesus is quoting from Isaiah. She (again) tries to point out that since LORD is in all-caps, it means that Jesus was saying Jehovah.

    Diana says, "It is not in all-caps in my Bible. It is "the Lord."

    I say, "It is in all-caps in mine, because the entire paragraph is in all-caps. That means it is a quote of Old Testament scriptures."

    Miss K is unphased, and does not even acknowledge that her point failed. She has us flip back to Isaiah, and read the reference, where it DOES say LORD, which means that the tetragrammaton appeared here in the text. "Since Jesus was reading it, he obviously said it!" We had read some verses about "don't take anything away from the scriptures, and don't add anything to them."

    Miss K said, "If Jesus never sinned or lied, then how could he have read this passage from Isaiah, unless he said God's name? If he removed or changed it, then he was sinning against God, and we agreed he never did that."

    I said, "If he said 'Jehovah,' then why does it say that he said 'the Lord?' "

    Miss K replied, "Well, we have already established (previous discussion) that the scriptures were being corrupted as early as the first century."

    I said, "Wait a minute. Why did we just sit here and agree that the Bible was true and accurate? God did not preserve it and keep it accurate?"

    Diana piped in with some questions about their translation, and she became a great way for Miss K to bob and weave, in and out of topics. They kept getting sidetracked, as Diana felt that this was her only chance to try to share the gospel of Christ with Miss K and her friend. She kept hitting them with both barrels (haha), and ended up getting frustrated and Miss K even went so far as to rudely tell her, "We are not talking about that today. We are talking about the name of Jehovah. You don't have to sit in with us, if you don't want to. I did not come here to argue."

    Diana said, "Can we discuss what is the truth?"

    Miss K said we could, but tried to re-establish her footing and put Diana in her place. ("I am the teacher here, not you!" was her attitude). I didn't want the whole thing to turn into a big cat fight, so I tried to get back on topic.

    "Can I ask a question? What word were the Jews using back then, when they pronounced the tetragrammaton?"

    Miss K said, "We don't know, but Jehovah is just the English translation, that we use today."

    I asked again, "Why is there no record of Jesus calling God by the name Jehovah, yet you claim that this was one of the key purposes of his coming to earth... to make His name known? There is no account of him saying the name himself."

    She repeated her answer, that the Bible was corrupted. I asked her what evidence they had that their revision was an accurate correction. She said something about the discovery of some "fragments" of something. (weak!)

    Diana and Miss K went back and forth a few times, as Diana kept confronting her on key JW doctrines. Each time, Miss K said, "I will be happy to come back and discuss that with you, but that is not what we are talking about today. You just DON'T KNOW ENOUGH about what the Bible says about the condition of the dead, etc..."

    Diana and Miss K are probably about equally matched, in how much they have studied the Bible. Diana does not have accurate understanding of Watchtower interpretations of the Bible, but she has read and studied the Bible many times, and from many different approaches. She does not use many commentaries or participate in those group Bible studies, that have the videos and workbooks. When Miss K's partner asked Diana if she used study aids or other books to help her understand the Bible, she asked why she would need to do that. "We just read the passage, where it said to keep asking, seeking and knocking, and the doors will be opened to you. I read and study the Bible and ask for guidance. The answers are all in the Bible. I don't need extra books or an organization to explain it to me."

    I found that comment made by Miss K interesting: "You don't KNOW ENOUGH yet." She said that at least 5 times. It was very interesting to watch a seasoned JW pioneer try to talk to what I would call a mature and steadfast evangelical Christian. It made me realize something about how the indoctrination process works... bit by bit, nibble by nibble, and peck by peck, they chip away at your preconceived notions.

    At one point, Miss K said to Diana, "I think I know why you are here. You are here, because you think FW is getting involved with a cult, and you want to protect her."

    Diana paused and looked at her, and said, "Noooo... I am here, because I think you are lost, and I wanted to try to win YOU over to the Lord."

    Both ladies had a physical response to this statement. Miss K's friend responded first. "That's nice of you, but I am not interested. Thank you anyway. After all that Jehovah has done for me, I have no interest in being drawn away. I could tell you my story, but we don't have time today. I had something bad happen to me, my home was broken into and I was very traumatized. I prayed to God to give me some answers, and the VERY NEXT DAY, the JW's came to my door, offering me answers to my questions. I started studying with them, became a JW, and have never experienced so much peace in my life as I have now. Especially now, with the end coming so swiftly, there is no way I would turn away from Jehovah. Thank you anyway, but no thank you." It was polite and slightly alarming at the same time.

    Miss K said basically the same thing, except something about how "I know I already have the truth, but thanks anyway."

    After that, the mood got a little more tense from their side of the table... I said, "So how about my question...? Is there anywhere in the Bible where Jesus says Jehovah? Why didn't they write it down, if it was so important? Jesus came to correct us and teach us... I think if that was so important, he would have made a bigger point of it. Can I share with you what I found?"

    I opened my Bible to John 17:6 and also read John 17:26, where Jesus said, "I have made your name known." They read along with me... then I went backward, skimming over John 17, saying "this was part of a long prayer Jesus said to his Father... notice, he calls him 'Father' at the beginning." Now go back to John 16, right before that... who is he talking about, and what name is he talking about? John 16:23, 24 & 26: Jesus tells them to use 'MY name, MY name, MY name.' Then later he says, 'I have made your name known.' The only name he has mentioned here, is his OWN name. I have not found anywhere in the Bible, where Jesus tells them to use any other personal name for God. He always calls him Father."

    Miss K says, "That's right. We ask for things in Jesus' name. There is no other way to get to Jehovah, unless we use the name of Jesus."

    I say, "But Jesus himself never even used the name. Why are JW's so fixated on calling God by the name Jehovah, when Jesus is the name above all names?"

    (She has already used the rationale that the Bible is corrupted and incomplete, so she comes up with a new one): "Do you call your father by his first name?"

    I said, "No way. I have known my dad's name since I was about 3 years old, but he would have a cow if I started calling him Doug."

    Miss K came back with, "Well, Jesus didn't call his Father by his first name either, out of respect for his position." (Ooooohhhh... wait, what?)

    I said, "But he told the disciples to call God by the name Jehovah... it was just removed from the scriptures, so there is no record of him ever saying that? If it was so important, then why did he keep telling them to call him Father?"

    Miss K said, "He didn't, remember? I showed you where he quoted the old testament and he obviously did not omit anything, because that would be a sin against God."

    I said, "He even gave us an example prayer in the Lord's Prayer. He said, 'When you pray, pray like this, 'Our Father, who art in Heaven...' He told them to call him 'Our Father.' "

    Miss K's friend said, "... let your name be sanctified."

    I said, "but he didn't tell us what it was... ??? Why didn't he tell us how to pronounce it? And why do you make a big show out of saying it over and over, even though you know it is a mispronunciation?"

    We were way past time at this point, and they were on their way out the door. Miss K sighed and said, "Well, it seems clear that you are happy with the path you are on. I thought that I could help shed some light on your questions and help you understand, but we will just stop wasting your time."

    I said, "Well, you keep coming here and telling me that you're telling me what the Bible actually says, yet you can't show me in the Bible where it actually says that..."

    I added, "Every question that I have asked you, you have not been able to answer. It is getting to the point, where I am just gathering a pile of claims that are not actually in the Bible. I am trying to follow what Jesus said to do, but the Watchtower does not agree with that."

    Miss K was resigning at this point, sighing and starting to leave, "I appreciate the iced tea. Thanks for talking with us today. It was nice to meet you, Diana."

    I said, "I've already studied that whole book... and it does not match what I am reading in the Bible."

    Miss K said, "Well, I don't think you ever looked at it from the right perspective. I was hoping I could help you understand, and show you what the Bible really says."

    I just said, "I know, and it's not personal at all. You just have not been able to back up your claims, when we try to examine these Watchtower teachings in the Bible."

    I summarized again, for the benefit of her friend, "The claims of the faithful and discreet slave, and the new articles I keep seeing in the magazines, featuring full page articles about governing body members... that really looks like they are holding themselves up as idols. Their power is based on one bible verse, which is part of a parable. They expect undying loyalty, and unquestioning obedience. They reign over millions of JW's worldwide."

    To that, Miss K said, "See... the way you put that, tells me that you are using some other source for your information. You did not get that from a Watchtower magazine. They never claimed that they reign over millions of people!!"

    I said, "It is my own observation, and I admit I drew my own conclusion there, based on the way they present themselves. I have seen the way they are idolized by JW's, even before I knew what the faithful and discreet slave even was..."

    "And then... there is the fact that you record all of your efforts on a time card and turn it into MEN for recognition of one kind or another, that contradicts what I read in Matthew 6:1-6, where Jesus warned them against doing their works for men. Why do you write your name on that time card? You are getting your rewards from men on earth! Do your good deeds in secret, and God will reward you."

    Miss K said, "I explained to you why we do that, and I'm sure there are people who don't do the time cards..."

    I said, "GOD is probably capable of keeping track of your efforts for you!" Her friend gave me a wide-eyed look.

    "And now, when I ask you why JW's are so fixated on saying 'Jehovah' all the time, we are not able to find anywhere in the Bible that instructs us to do that. I think you are making an idol out of the name of your religion. I am trying to follow Jesus, the name above all names. I think you are being deceived."

    After a few more niceties, they left. I felt bad for them, as they were walking away. I don't know if there will be any repercussions from this final BS session. I will now be added to Miss K's list of Bible Studies that ended... but if she shrugs her shoulders again and says, "I don't know WHAT happened..." she will be lying. I did try to explain to her, and I do feel nothing but compassion for her.

    She is just lost and deceived. At least I kept her off some other people's doorsteps for about 30 hours...

    I wonder if she will come back again, or if she realizes that I actually might be an apostate (whatever that means)??

  • losingit
    losingit

    Wow! At some point in my life I hope to have a discussion with a JW the way you did. I'm so happy you were able to keep your critical thinking cap on and not fall for the bs. Excellent points and summary by you and your friend! Thanks for the update!

    One question, and if you like PM the answer: why are you still involved with religion after your experience with jws?

  • Wasanelder Once
    Wasanelder Once

    Yep, too long

  • Crazyguy
    Crazyguy

    Great job you finally stood up to her and gave it back the way she was trying to push her ideals on you. Your responces were perfect now its time you start using some of these scriptures on your family. Show them Galations 1:6 where we are to proclaim the messah only, show them rev.1:5 where jesus is already king, show them rev.5:10 in the greek interleaner where the word "kings" does not appear and thier on the earth not over it. Show them verse 9 and then compare it to rev.7:9 showing its the great crowd thats being talked about and not the 144k. And dont forget to show them matt 5 end of the chapter where jesus says to love all and not to shun. Your work is not done you must try to save your family from this cult...I love they way you ended it with miss K!!!

  • cultBgone
    cultBgone

    Nice completion. You made it clear they are worshipping men and they panicked. It's amazing they think all people who don't agree with them must be evil apostates. It never offers to them that some folks actually use their thinking abilities! Very happy you saw through the craziness.

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Well, at the very least, pride would of course prevent a Witness in Miss K's position from admitting she had failed at proving anything, or that you might have a valid point. Maybe you've given her something to think about, or her partner. But of course giving up their faith in the org. would mean a whole bunch of things that they are probably not willing to do -- their expectations about paradise and the resurrection, the socialization with the cong., their title of pioneer (or at least Miss K's title, if the other woman is not a pioneer), etc.

    So, I'm mainly just glad that you dodged the bullet of the religion and are free to live your life without their Pharisaic burdens. And now you can have your weekends to yourself again!

  • NotNew
    NotNew

    Excellent...

    SW

  • Phaedra
    Phaedra

    Diana paused and looked at her, and said, "Noooo... I am here, because I think you are lost, and I wanted to try to win YOU over to the Lord."

    LOL ~ what a lead balloon moment!

    Thanks for sharing the wrap-up session. I can see where you're both coming from.

    This scenario reminds me of that quote that goes something like, "Two convinced of their own arguments won't be swayed by the other."

    If I were to be Christian, I think BA is the way to go over being a JW.

    Hopefully it was worth your time and effort to engage Miss K all this time.

    Interesting reading!

    Phae

  • blondie
    blondie

    20 years ago I studied with a couple who were Protestant missionaries from Central America. I already had decided that as an organization the WTS did not have God's special backing, probably even his censure like the Jews, losing his special favor. No love as Jesus said there would be. But no big doctrinal problems. So many religions teach the trinity and hellfire, which I could never accept. The WTS was the lesser of the evils doctrinally. It started me on my search online and on the first WT-CD and my family's library back to the 1920's. I eventually left because of the doctrinal lies I found as well as the lack of love.

    They brought up whether Jesus was Michael the Archangel from the bible only.

    Michael the Archangel

    Michael the Archangel is described in Daniel 10:13 as "Mi´cha·el, one of the foremost princes" and at Revelation 12:7 it says " Mi´cha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled." In the fifty years between 1880 and 1930 there were five changes as to who Michael was.

    1. An Angel that worships Jesus

    "Hence it is said, "Let all the angels of God worship him;" [that must include Michael, the chief angel, hence Michael is not the Son of God] and the reason is, because He has "by inheritance obtained a more excellent Name than they."" Zion's Watch Tower 1879 Nov p.4

    2. The Pope and Antichrist

    "Michael and his angels"--the papacy and its supporters--fought against the dragon--pagan rulers, etc.,-- and the great dragon was cast out of heaven. Zion's Watch Tower 1879 December p.6

    3. Michael was the pre-human Jesus Christ

    "Can it be that he who was called Michael--Jehovah's chief-messenger--was none other than our Lord in his pre-human condition? we conclude that HE must have been "chief messenger." " Zion's Watch Tower 1883 June p.3

    4. The Pope again

    "Michael.--- "Who as God," the Pope." The Finished Mystery 1917 p.188

    5. Jesus in heaven

    Since the 1930's Michael is explained to be the heavenly name for Jesus.

    "For many years Jehovah's Witnesses have taught that Michael is a heavenly name for the only-begotten Son of God, who was named Jesus while on earth." Watchtower 1984 December 15 p.26

    The Governing Body of the Watchtower Society demonstrate that they have no idea as to how to interpret Revelation.

    The second was the 2300 days

    2300 days

    1800's

    In the early 1800's John Aquila Brown taught that the 2300 days of Daniel 8:14 ended in 1844. Russell felt the cleansing of the sanctuary at the end of the 2300 days occurred in 1846, understood to be when Storrs abandoned false doctrines. Studies in the Scriptures Series 3 pp.67,108 and Series 7 p.163 explains that 2300 years extends from 454 B.C. (the start of the prophecy of the 70 weeks with the rebuilding of the temple) to 1846 A.D.

    1900's

    The current understanding of the 2300 days show just how strange Watchtower interpretation has become in a vigorous effort to find some 20th century application. From June 1st 1938 to October 15th 1944 is about 2320 days.

    "For "the holy place" to be "brought," or restored, to what it should be, the 2,300 days must have begun when it previously was in the "right condition" from God's standpoint. At the earliest, this was on June 1, 1938, when The Watchtower published part 1 of the article "Organization." Part 2 appeared in the issue of June 15, 1938. Counting 2,300 days (6 years, 4 months, and 20 days on the Hebrew calendar) from June 1 or 15, 1938, brings us to October 8 or 22, 1944. On the first day of a special assembly held at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., on September 30 and October 1, 1944, the Watch Tower Society's president spoke on the subject "The Theocratic Alignment Today." At the annual corporate meeting on October 2, the Society's charter was amended in an effort to bring it as close to a theocratic arrangement as the law would allow. With the publication of clarified Biblical requirements, theocratic organization was soon more fully installed in the congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses. In fact, The Watchtower of October 15, 1944, contained an article entitled "Organized for Final Work." It and other service-oriented articles of the same period indicated that the 2,300 days had ended and that "the holy place" was again in its "right condition." Pay Attention to Daniel's prophecy pp.177-179

    http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/revelation-daniel-prophetic-interpretation.php

    1846- "Then, 1810 years (prophetic, symbolic days) must be the measure from the close of the seventy weeks to the time when the Sanctuary class will be cleansed from the various defilements of Papacy--the desolating abomination which has for so many centuries defiled the temple of God. The death of Messiah, as shown, was in the spring of A.D. 33; and this was the midst or middle of the last week of the seventy, the full end of which was therefore a half week, or three and a half years later--in the autumn of A.D. 36. Therefore, 1810 years from the autumn of A.D. 36, viz., the autumn of 1846, marks the end of the vision of the 2300 days, and the date when the Sanctuary was due to be cleansed. This prophecy being fulfilled, we should expect, in this as in other cases of fulfilled prophecy, to find the facts proving its fulfilment clearly set forth on the pages of history; for, though historians are often unbelievers in the Bible and the God of the Bible, yet, unknown to them, God has overruled their work, so that wherever a prophecy has been fulfilled, the facts have unmistakably passed into history, and always on good and reliable authority. And so it has been in this case of the cleansing of the Sanctuary." {TKIC 107-8}

    1846- "We have marked, too, the fixed dates to which the Prophet Daniel calls attention. The 2,300 days point to 1846 as the time when God's sanctuary would be cleansed of the defiling errors and principles of Papacy; and we have noted the cleansing there accomplished." {TKIC 305-6}

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Wow, I didn't know that Michael was originally interpreted differently by the Society. The application of 2300 days to a roughly 2300-day period from June 1938 to Oct. 1944 is just sad.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit