by non_trias_theos 35 Replies latest jw friends
It depends on what one means by person and sameness. The reply to your inquiry also relies on my personal acquaintance with this duns character or with the individual who was the online entity you are talking about.
Let's assume you're talking to a non-philosopher, and you could only answer with 'yes' or 'no'. On second thought, never mind. You've answered clearly enough.
Good to see you back, duns. I'm sure after dateline airs, you'll have many new threads to contribute.
$$$non-trias-theos and others like him/her are obsessed with Farkel and others with that kind of knowledge and intelligence.$$$
Obssessed with Farkel? You people just blindly defend one another, don't you? Farkel says he is going to dog non. Non just beating him to the punch.
$$$NonTrias envies Farkel and the like, because he/she knows that Farkel is right, bright, has common sense, can see through all the smog spewed by NonTrias and others and he/she will never even come close ...$$$
You are biased. Farkel may be bright in some areas of life. But he is not all knowing. There is a lot that non knows which Fark does not. So why should non be jealous of Farkel? He is as wrong as the day is long when it comes to many thangs. And he need some classes in logic and grammar. He is the one who said he did not know what terms non used meant. Non was just showing a brother love.
Hmmm
$$$Let's assume you're talking to a non-philosopher, and you could only answer with 'yes' or 'no'. On second thought, never mind.$$$
Non never said he was a philosopher, did he? Be careful how you read the text. It can be deceptive. Non just does not like to answer questions that are not properly nuanced.
$$$You've answered clearly enough.$$$
Are you sure?
$$$Good to see you back, duns. I'm sure after dateline airs, you'll have many new threads to contribute.$$$
Why you call me, duns? The person now representin' is non.
non goes to great lengths to show off yet says nothing worthwhile:
: You see I corrected myself. Is the person behind the entity the same person who was behind the dunscot entity that posted here last summer?$$$
: It depends on what one means by person and sameness.
non's answer: define "person." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
: The reply to your inquiry also relies on my personal acquaintance with this duns character or with the individual who was the online entity you are talking about.
Yep. We'll have to give you a "G+" for clarity and coherence.
I can only conclude that you enjoy looking foolish, so I'll give you a "G+" for that, too.
I know you love writing and I know you love reading what you've written. Too bad it's simply terrible.
Farkel
And he need some classes in logic and grammar. He is the one who said he did not know what terms non used meant. -- non_trias_theos
You might benefit from some remedial grammar lessons as well.
Non was just showing a brother love. - - non_trias-theos
That's very sweet of you, but Farkel hasn't disclosed his sexual orientation on this site, so maybe you should show your "love" to some other "brother."
$$$non's answer: define "person." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!$$$
What is so funny about non's request?
: The reply to your inquiry also relies on my personal acquaintance with this duns character or with the individual who was the online entity you are talking about.
$$$Yep. We'll have to give you a "G+" for clarity and coherence.$$$
That feels so good coming from you.
$$$I can only conclude that you enjoy looking foolish, so I'll give you a "G+" for that, too.$$$
Do not bother.
$$$I know you love writing and I know you love reading what you've written. Too bad it's simply terrible.$$$
you mean like your graphic skybalon?
$$$You might benefit from some remedial grammar lessons as well.$$$
Would not we all?
$$$That's very sweet of you, but Farkel hasn't disclosed his sexual orientation on this site, so maybe you should show your "love" to some other "brother."$$$
There is more than one way to show a brother love. Ain't you ever heard of agape love? You obviously do not know what time it is.
: Ain't you ever heard of agape love?
The WTS says that agape love is based upon principles. One must have them to show it. Therefore, you'll have to try some other kind of love.
Farkel
$$$The WTS says that agape love is based upon principles. One must have them to show it. Therefore, you'll have to try some other kind of love.$$$
This observation comes from a man whose intelligence is highly acclaimed on this board?
In case you do not know--and you don't--every rational substance has principles. The principles that one holds dear may be noble or ignoble ones. But even non has principles. Even you have principles. I cannot believe you would think that any human is devoid of principles. Get to that critical thinking class quick!
There is a lot that non knows which Fark does not. So why should non be jealous of Farkel?
Examples please ! what do you know that Farkel doesn't know ?
You are jealous of Farkel, because he is loved and lovable and you're not !
By the way, why do you speak of yourself in the third person singular ? It reminds me of Kings of old...
$$$Examples please !$$$
Declensions, cases, modal logic, foreign languages, liberatory epistemology, psychology, conjugations and lexemes, for starters. But I try to be modest.
$$$what do you know that Farkel doesn't know ?$$$
I just told you.
$$$You are jealous of Farkel, because he is loved and lovable and you're not !$$$
Give non a break!
$$$By the way, why do you speak of yourself in the third person singular ? It reminds me of Kings of old...$$$
Cause I is a king.
