JC's and recordings? (page 2)

DaleRivers

If one of the elders has a devious streak, he could record the JC himself.

stuckinarut2

Great references "the searcher"!

And "problemaddict"... Wow...just wow....you handled that well! Very similar things have happened with my wife and I too... I also highlighted the strangness of it....

I have recorded several chats with elders! I have also kept them for insurance. no one (except yourselves here) would beleive the methods used and questions asked! I also realised right then, that there is no way this org is 'god?directed'......

StarTrekAngel

I have the facebook profile of one of the most arrogant elders in my cong. Screenshoot of this "followed" page. He's got a couple of porn stars there. Strategy is that if I ever get pulled into a JC, I would let it run its course (Record it off course). Appeal and then claim the holly spirit could had not possibly be present in that JC, based on the facts.

They did the same to me and my wife. Unfortunately I was out of town when they called her in. While the matter was trivial, the attitude bothered me even more. Having been such a trivial issue, there was no need to pull her. All they had to do was call me or wait two days and ask us together.

Ignoranceisbliss

I have already purchased my hidden recorder and have it ready to go. Hopefully I never need to use it.

LostGeneration

While the matter was trivial, the attitude bothered me even more. Having been such a trivial issue, there was no need to pull her.

This is the basis for the whole 'authority' structure. If they feel they can pull anyone back at any given time for any reason, and the sheep comply, they have nothing to ever worry about. The first thing to always ask is "To discuss what?" the second they try this shit. They don't like that one bit, as you are questioning their right to even do their back room trick. Next step is to always decline the invitiation and tell them you need a little time to pray about it, as you need to be in the right mindset. From there you can decide if you even want to proceed.

Oh, and if you have a JW wife tell her that she needs to speak with you first before any meetings will ever happen.

tunnistaja.ee

Often complex questions have simple (but unfortunate) answers. No, they will not start using metal detectors and sniff dogs. But they will more and more rule out lengthy discussions with the TTATT-aware accused. Take Ceddars example. They just told him that they need to do the procedure, but refused to discuss doctrine with him.

What they can do with those who they don't know being aware TTATT or not? They can just "gather the evidence" in private conversations before the JC meeting and pull the "we have been through all this, no more discussion here" card when the big day comes.

JC's and recordings?