I am not a scientist
Or particularly educated on science.
and only an armchair cosmologist.
No. No you aren't.
I have come to see, that these people, Krauss, Penrose, Davis, Krauss, Feynman et al seem to be very vague when it comes to the beyond, the before, the void of the future, the cosmos.
Anyone who claims to know more than those you listed (such as yourself) is either a liar or a fool.
I see a world picture trying to incorporate all this, and am stuck with a model where there was always time, a given, part of an unfathonable, eternal 'ueber', or 'Ur" dimension, a void beyond our capacity to mesure, understand.
You pretend to, while claiming to be only a casual observer, to know more than the finest minds ever to study the subject. You are either a liar or a fool. Or both, I suppose. You present your ramblings as fact when in fact they are at best comic book quality science.
As a compulsive worker and deliberate 'out-of-the-box thinker' with tangible patent, $, results
Yeah, that means exactly nothing. Literally, nothing.
When people charactarize what I say with these ideas as a base, as babbel, as rambling, it is, because they must have a better model, they are not trying to see my consistency.
Consistently babbling and rambling in no way lends credence to that babbling or rambling.