Sorry, only time for a quick post.
Poor white people in bad areas still had images being fed to them of successful white people constantly, and had an identity that was not centered around race, unless they happened to be in areas where THEY were the minorities.
Isn't that a contradiction - I can't tell if they are or aren't meant to identify themselves because of race?
I don't think white people do identify themselves with rich or successful people because of race. In the UK you grew up with images of the royal family and they were a million miles away from who you were. You never thought "hey, they are white - just like me!". They may as well have been a different species for how much you identified with them. There was certainly no positive racial reinforcement from it.
The things I remember about race from growing up were the direct personal interactions - the indian guy at the corner shop who always said hello to you on your way to school etc... Maybe in the UK we were just less influenced by TV by comparison to the US or TV was different. I seem to remember there being lots of black people on TV in both kids programmes and others when I was growing up. Maybe they were trail-blazers at the time but we didn't know so much about it when you're a kid.
I agree the story and how the build up of opportunity can happen but it makes a little too much of lack of information. I think for the past 20-30 years at least there has been free information of ideas and opportunity and those ideas stretch back to the 50's and 60's as they gave rise to the social changes and civil rights movement. I do accept that the personal belief in what could be achieved no doubt lagged the spread of ideas that such achievement could be an idea to aim for.
Sorry, rushed post so I'll try and expand on things later.