First entry:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/11279376/Doctors-can-ignore-deeply-held-views-of-two-Jehovahs-Witnesses-to-treat-their-burns-victim-son.html
But Mr Justice Peter Jackson gave doctors permission not to administer blood transfusions to a 63-year-old woman who was a Jehovah's Witness.
The woman had subsequently died.
Doctors working for Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust had asked for permission to withhold a blood transfusion.
They said the woman, who had been a Jehovah's Witness since the 1970s at least and had a history of depression and paranoid schizophrenia, was "gravely ill".
Mr Justice Peter Jackson said that when doctors made the application the woman had "clearly lacked" the mental capacity to make or communicate decisions about treatment.
But the judge said that after being admitted to hospital the woman had been "adamant" that she did not want treatment with any blood products.
He concluded that the woman had made a decision, when she had the mental capacity, that doctors rightly considered had to be respected.
The judge said the human right to life was "fundamental" but not absolute. He said there was no obligation on a patient to accept life-saving treatment and doctors were not entitled or obliged to give treatment.