Of course science has provided us a clue to actual origins of Human Development Surprising how few people today are ignorant to these details:
Not the biblical Eve
Owing to its figurative reference to the first woman in the Biblical Book of Genesis, the Mitochondrial Eve theory initially met with enthusiastic endorsement from some young earth creationists, who viewed the theory as a validation of the biblical creation story. Some even went so far as to claim that the Mitochondrial Eve theory disproved evolution. [ 37 ] [ 38 ] [ 39 ] However, the theory does not suggest any relation between biblical Eve and Mitochondrial Eve because Mitochondrial Eve:
- is not a fixed individual
- had a mother
- was not the only woman of her time, and
- Y-chromosomal Adam is unlikely to have been her sexual partner, or indeed to have been contemporaneous to her.
estimates of the age of the last common mitochondrial ancestor continue to be refined. A recent estimate (March 2013) from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology shows that Mitochondrial Eve lived about 160,000 years ago (within the reserved estimate of the original research) and also that the non-African humans were separated from Africans about 95,000 years ago. [ 50 ]
What would you rather believe?, Scientific Evidence or Biblical Fairy Tales