Messages Messages Help
Reply | Forward | View Source | Unwrap Lines | Delete | Remove Author
Message 11853 of 11856 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] Message Index Msg #
From: "nowaytess" < [email protected]>
Date: Fri May 31, 2002 10:19 pm
Subject: Watchtower's Letter to Dateline
Just got this from Troy of JaH Christians. I have to agree with the
fact these guys are not too bright, acually admit to the fact they
are covering up molestation cases. I think they allowing us to see
what is in store for JWS who decent next and to justify it. I don't
think these guys are so stupid this letter will be all over the
Internet in an hour or so.
WATCHTOWER'S LETTER TO DATELINE NBC: Drafuse writes "It's amazing to
read this letter. When the issue in question is pedophiles inside the
Jehovah's Witnesses congregations, Director J.R. Brown talks
about "views and opinions [that] should be heard within the framework
of the congregation". Everyone can understand this is a painful story
for the Watchtower, but writing a letter to NBC Dateline that proves
the Watchtower is actually doing all they can to cover up these
cases, is absolutely fantastic. We have never regarded J.R. Brown and
his fellow "brothers" in "Office of Public Information" extremely
smart - but we did not think they were this stupid either! Here is
the letter:"
February 7, 2002
Richard Greenberg
Dateline NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Dear Mr. Greenberg:
I am writing in response to your invitation for an on-camera
interview on upcoming Dateline NBC telecast. Thank you for the
opportunity to participate; we appreciate your efforts to be fair and
balanced. As you know, we have endeavoured to cooperate with you and
your staff as you worked to put the program together.
Regarding your request for a spokesperson, we recently brought before
the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses, and they respectfully
declined, as it would appear to pit brother against brother and this
is not the Christian way to resolve differences. We do not feel that
a nationwide television program is the forum in which to discuss
differences in viewpoint between members of our religion. In this
situation, you have related to us that your participants are
primarily individuals who still regards themselves as Jehovah's
Witnesses. We therefore do not view them as adversaries, but as
individuals whose views and opinions should be heard within the
framework of the congregation, or church, and not in front of a
nationwide television audience. This would be in harmony with what
the apostle Paul admonished, as recorded in the Bible at 1
Corinthians 1:10, "that you should all speak in agreement, and that
there should not be divisions among you, but that you be fitly united
in the same mind and in the same line of thought." Our Governing Body
is willing to resolve differences of opinion within the framework of
the congregation and according to Scriptural principles.
This is not to say that Jehovah's Witnesses are opposed to the idea
of on-camera interviews in general; however, it is not felt
appropriate in this circumstance. Again, we want to thank you for
your invitation, and we ask that you understand our reasons for not
accepting it.
Sincerely
J.R Brown
Director
Office of Public Information