Judgement Starts At The House Of God

by NewWay 37 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • hillary_step
    hillary_step

    Hi NewWay,

    Yes, I understand your viewpoint, though I suspect it will evolve somewhat as time goes on....lol I do believe that most posters on the Board with any experience are aware of the frailty attached to the keyboard world and its mode of communication.

    As you are new to the Board I would suggest that you use the excellent facility designed by Simon just underneath your profile that will allow you to read posts and threads made by posters. It will give you a heads up on the personalities in this little community and you might note that I never fire my cannons without good cause, seldom if ever jump to conclusions, and where the individual is concerned that I mentioned, he would be the first to admit I believe, that I always endeavour to give the benefit of the doubt to posters and their motives.

    That having been said, I do not suffer fools gladly, collectively or individually, especially when they design their posts to demean others.

    Best regards - HS

  • You Know
    You Know

    HS,

    Repectfully Robert, from your post this person could only conclude that you are both an 'absursity' and an 'insult' to God and Christ by your claim to be a friend of Christ.

    How so? I merely pointed out a fallacy in his reasoning and that the conclusion he was drawing was absurd. The poster in fact admitted that he didn't even believe what he was saying anyway, which makes his point all the more absurd.

    The reality is that you appear in your posts to be nothing but a spiteful, unreasonable wind-bag with a penchant for theological fraud.

    I made a valid point. You on the other hand contributed absolutely zero to the topic at hand. Who now is the mere windbag? Or as Job asked of the apostates of his day: Is there an end to windy words? / You know

  • hillary_step
    hillary_step

    lol...Robert,

    Well, I suppose it depends what you define by what is a contribution to a thread or not.

    I welcomed a newcomer who introduced himself to the Board and warned him that you have a long term-reputation for being a rather spiteful and abrasive person, quite a contribution I would think where a persons emotions are concerned.

    Without greeting him you then set out to tear apart the point he tried to make in his post, as ever twisting the import and placing your own interpretation on it so you could then commence one of your preaching campaigns. He may be new to your techniques Robert, but we all know them very well.

    But as you wish a contribution from me on a more theological grounding and more in keeping with your own view of what this person was saying in his post, just take a look at this :

    The glaring condradiction in your reasoning is that if God's judgment begins with his own house first, as the scripture says, that means in fact that it is God's house. Your fallacy is in the faithless assumption that Jehovah is not cognizant or that he is incapable of dealing with corruption within his organization. That of course is an absurdity and an insult to both God and Christ.

    You have immediately presumed that the person, the readers of his post and the lurkers to this site share your view that the WTS is the house of God. I did not see that mentioned in his post. It is an assumption on your part that NewWay still accepts that the WTS is in Gods eyes any different from any other religion who claim Christianity as their foundation. As you assert that the WTS is indeed the House Of God, and that is quite a statement to make, you need to provide clear an unequivocal evidence to this effect. Please provide it.

    I must warn you now, that I will enter an exchange with you only if you keep your tone civil and try to resist the temptation to refer to me as a 'slithering weasel', or any other one of your more commonly used expressions!

    Best regards - HS

    Edited by - hillary_step on 20 June 2002 16:11:22

    Edited by - hillary_step on 20 June 2002 16:27:0

  • NewWay
    NewWay

    Thank you again, HS for your support.

    Now then, YouKnow, I gave opportunity for you to reassess your approach to my post, and deal in a considerate manner, based on the scripture given in James. However, based on what HS has said and what my instincts tell me you are not the sort of person to have a polite constructive conversation with. I will not waste my time in playing games with someone who twist my words and who is obviously not a gentleman. From what I know of JWs and the organisation, I doubt that you are of the 'anointed', but rather one who, had you been born at the time, would have been very much at home as an Inquisitor for the Catholic Church, hunting down 'heretics'. I certainly will not be explaining myself any further to you or speaking to you, as it is evident that you are here to cause trouble and ill-feeling. If you are truly a member of 'the anointed' then shame on you for the tactics and bad manners you obviously are well-known to exhibit. Certainly, you are no 'hiding place from the wind'! My face is now turned away from you and will stay that way.

  • You Know
    You Know

    I welcomed a newcomer who introduced himself to the Board

    As did I.

    Without greeting him you then set out to tear apart the point he tried to make in his post, as ever twisting the import and placing your own interpretation on it so you could then commence one of your preaching campaigns.

    Perhaps it was over kill. LOL

    You have immediately presumed that the person, the readers of his post and the lurkers to this site share your view that the WTS is the house of God.

    I didn't assume any such thing. I merely took the poster at his word. NewWay is the one who pointed out that God judges his own house first. I agreed with him. I knew of course he didn't believe what he was saying, as he later admitted. I challenged him to rethink what he was thinking, which is what I do.

    As you assert that the WTS is indeed the House Of God, and that is quite a statement to make, you need to provide clear an unequivocal evidence to this effect. Please provide it.

    Actually, I don't believe that the Watchtower is God's house either. Bethel is just a word. According to the scriptures the house of God is the congregation of anointed ones. But, I knew what NewWay was saying and I saw no point to issue with the technicalities because the two are closely related.

    I must warn you now, that I will enter an exchange with you only if you keep your tone civil and try to resist the temptation to refer to me as a 'slithering weasel', or any other one of your more commonly used expressions!

    You are just trying to weasel out. LOL / You Know

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Hey NewWay,Welcome to the board.I see you have met hillary_step one of our respected posters,and the village idiot You Know.You are spot on with your assesment of him.I have read some of your posts,you will make a nice addition to the board...OUTLAW

  • NewWay
    NewWay

    Thank you OutLaw, my face is turned towards you!

  • You Know
    You Know
    I will not waste my time in playing games with someone who twist my words and who is obviously not a gentleman.

    You are apparently a bit confused. I didn't twist anything you said. I took what you said at face value and commented how absurd it was to point to God's solution while stumbling over the problem. If it's any consolation you are not the only one who thinks that way.

    From what I know of JWs and the organisation, I doubt that you are of the 'anointed', but rather one who, had you been born at the time, would have been very much at home as an Inquisitor for the Catholic Church, hunting down 'heretics'.

    The Inquisitors were anti-thought. I merely challenged you to think, which obviously sometimes elicts a violent reaction on the part of those so challenged.

    I certainly will not be explaining myself any further to you or speaking to you, as it is evident that you are here to cause trouble and ill-feeling.

    It makes no difference to me whether you explain yourself or not. The way a discussion board like this works is that everyone has the right to challenge others, as well as the right not to defend their thoughts if they choose not to. I certainly don't respond to every poster that responds to me. Like a brother once said: "We can't take time to kick at every dog that barks." But, I do reserve the right to point out fallacies in your thinking, should the occasion arise again, just as you can go on about by manner if you want.

    If you are truly a member of 'the anointed' then shame on you for the tactics and bad manners you obviously are well-known to exhibit. Certainly, you are no 'hiding place from the wind'! My face is now turned away from you and will stay that way.

    Aren't we being a bit dramatic here? Maybe you don't like my manner, that's fine. But, again, I merely challenged you to think in ways that you may not be accustomed. Some people appreciate it, while others don't. At least we know where we stand now. / You Know

  • bjc2012
    bjc2012

    You Know,

    You are apparently a bit confused. I didn't twist anything you said. I took what you said at face value and commented how absurd it was to point to God's solution while stumbling over the problem. ...The Inquisitors were anti-thought. I merely challenged you to think, which obviously sometimes elicts a violent reaction on the part of those so challenged. ...It makes no difference to me whether you explain yourself or not. The way a discussion board like this works is that everyone has the right to challenge others, as well as the right not to defend their thoughts if they choose not to. ... I do reserve the right to point out fallacies in your thinking, should the occasion arise again, just as you can go on about by manner if you want.

    What about the "fallacy" and "absurdity" of your beliefs? Here is the "fallacy" in your thinking and the total "absurdity" of it all.

    Actually, I don't believe that the Watchtower is God's house either. Bethel is just a word. According to the scriptures the house of God is the congregation of anointed ones.

    Good point. So then, are the "anointed" among JWs today, based upon what we are seeing by way of conduct? The truly "anointed", as those of the first century? Let's see.

    Below, you will notice I've cited two prophecies that match almost perfectly.

    Ezekiel 20:35-38 :: New International Version (NIV) Ezekiel 20
    35 I will bring you into the desert of the nations and there, face to face, I will execute judgment upon you. 36 As I judged your fathers in the desert of the land of Egypt, so I will judge you, declares the Sovereign LORD . 37 I will take note of you as you pass under my rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant. 38 I will purge you of those who revolt and rebel against me. Although I will bring them out of the land where they are living, yet they will not enter the land of Israel. Then you will know that I am the LORD .
    Revelation 12:1,6,13,14,15 :: New International Version (NIV) Revelation 12
    1 A great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. 6 The woman fled into the desert to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days.
    13 When the dragon saw that he had been hurled to the earth, he pursued the woman who had given birth to the male child. 14 The woman was given the two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the desert, where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent's reach. 15 Then from his mouth the serpent spewed water like a river, to overtake the woman and sweep her away with the torrent.

    Most can see these two bible accounts match and foretell the future for Israel. A "face-to-face" meeting with God for "judgment". Israel is full of outright "revolters" and "rebels". Apostates in their own right, against God -- a disgusting sight to Him!

    And yet you say, the "anointed", the truly "anointed" are among them? What???

    It comes as no surprise of course to you, that the "woman" who has the "crown of 12 stars" on her head pictures "Israel" of Bible prophecy, the connection being the "twelve tribes" of the nation. And both Bible accounts show, the "wilderness" will be her next home for a while, because of "sin" on her part. Transgression that she will at that time, finally admit to having been guilty of. Repentance on her part, finally. But it took this trip to the "wilderness" to bring all of this about, didn't it? Her confession of actual "sin" in God's eyes. The confession is found at Micah 7:8, 9 .

    From these two prophetic Bible accounts, we who believe in prophecy learn a few undeniable things. For those of us who still see the prophetic scriptures as still, largely yet unfulfilled that is, in its fullest sense, we can glean the following points:

    1) All (and not part) of Israel is "chased" off their land to the "wilderness of the peoples." This is clearly God's doing. The entire nation is sent to the "wilderness of the peoples" for "JUDGEMENT" and a "face to face" meeting with God. (Isa. 30:26; Micah 4:6,7; Jeremiah 30:17; 23, 24; Ezekiel 20:35-38)

    The "sanctity" of God's Name at stake. Of utmost importance. (Ezekiel 20:44; 36:20-23; also Ezekiel 37:29 see footnote lg prt NWT Ref Bib. where God moves to "sanctify" His Own Name when Israel does not.)

    2) All wrongdoers are "purged" from God's People (Israel) WHILE IN WILDERNESS, while estranged from God and under His "face-to-face" judgment of them, in total condemnation. And after the "purging", the wicked among His people (Israel) are NOT allowed to return or "re-enter the land of Israel", as God inspects all things.

    3) While in the "wilderness of the peoples", Israel must "pass under God's rod" and accept His new "covenant" arrangement from God. A non-negotiable position. God sees the necessity of Israel being "re-bonded" to Him through a non-negotiable proposed "Covenant" arrangement of His, BEFORE they are allowed to go back to their land. Israel must "rejoin themselves" to God in a "indefinitely lasting covenant that will never be forgotten", as Jeremiah 50:4,5 says.

    Now back to your original statement.

    Actually, I don't believe that the Watchtower is God's house either. Bethel is just a word. According to the scriptures the house of God is the congregation of anointed ones.

    The "congregation of anointed ones"? Are you kidding.

    Questions To Ponder about "Anointed" among JWs:

    (a) If "Israel" is to receive another "covenant" from God, what in the world happened TO THE FIRST ONE, the "christian" covenant?

    (b) How can those who are truly "anointed" be "re-bonded" with God in another "covenant" arrangement? Is such a thing even possible for "anointed" ones based upon the explicit statements made by Paul at Hebrews 6:4-8 and Hebrews 10:26-31 -- "anointed" wrongdoers that have openly "esteemed as ordinary value the blood of the covenant" as anointed footstep followers -- so much so that they NEED another "covenant" arrangement with God? Paul says, this is not "possible" at all. The "anointed" apostle John said the "anointed" simply do not "practice sin" at all because of the "reproductive seed" of the holy spirit within them. They simply don't do it...period. (See 1 John 3:9)

    Now, "You Know", when you are ready to face such questions, you will see where you have erred in your estimation of prophetic matters of the future. You will see the "fallacy" and "absurdity" in your own thinking -- the "absurdity" in saying the "anointed" of JWs represent "the congregation" or "household of God". When you come around to that, then you will have to admit the obvious, that these same so-called "anointed" ones you speak of, could not possibly have fallen so low, so low as to be sent to the "wilderness", while having God's "reproductive seed" within them. That simply could not happen.

    And yet we see, that is exactly what has happened to the congregation of JWs. To Israel. The Bible shows Israel will by that time, have fallen so much, in such bad spiritual shape, that they need to be "re-bonded" to God in another "covenant" arrangement. So says the prophecy. And then, you expect us to believe that God is going to allow them to go off to heaven to rule with Christ and other faithful followers of the first century, and rule over everybody else??? Totally absurd -- the "fallacy" in your thinking, I think.

    bjc

    Edited by - bjc2012 on 20 June 2002 21:5:56

  • You Know
    You Know

    Most can see these two bible accounts match and foretell the future for Israel. A "face-to-face" meeting with God for "judgment". Israel is full of outright "revolters" and "rebels". Apostates in their own right, against God -- a disgusting sight to Him!

    Yes, that's what I have been talking about for a few years. Jehovah is going to hold an accounting with his people. Are you imaginging that you are teaching me something that I don't already know? That's the point: Jehovah will judge his house.

    And yet you say, the "anointed", the truly "anointed" are among them? What???

    That's what the scriptures say that you just quoted. It says: "AND I WILL PURGE YOU OF THOSE WHO REBEL AND REVOLT AGAINST ME." If the true anointed weren't among the false sons there would be no need for God to make a separation would there? If God makes a purge, then the converse though must likewise be true, namely, that there are those among Jehovah's sons who aren't guilty of revolt and hence they won't be purged when we go into the period of judgment. It's as Jesus said that he would send forth his angels and collect out of his kingdon all persons doing lawlessness. Obviously there are apostates and unfaithful ones among us. That's hardly new light. Clearly you don't know what you are talking about. As Paul said, you want to be a teacher, yet you don't perceive the things about which you are making strong assertions. / You Know

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit