Secret WTS Social Agenda

by spaz 53 Replies latest jw friends

  • spaz
    spaz

    This is a both a departure from the conventional paleo-hellenic concepts of logic to a primitive yet equally tenable principle of,'actions speaking louder than words', and a synopsis.

    The WTS is but one of many groups which are devoted to the disintergration of the traditional or biblical family structure, via nefarious means, as part of a greater plan that envisions a two-class new world order resembling feudalism.

    The philosophic means to achieve this state is non-biblical. The WTS repudiates the Christian principle of "loving your neighbour AS yourself " by adopting an altruistic approach which demands to 'love your neighbour above yourself ". Selfishness is the opposite of altruism and says 'love yourself above your neighbour'. Individuals are thus led to consider themselves lesser, dirty and sinful, not worthy of another person's love and cannot love another "AS" he should himself..

    The starting point is altruism. A gender role-reversal policy then disturbs functional heterosexuality from where a host of problems ensue. Crowded around is the creation of an Orwellian, Big Brother, mind-conditioned culture. Take a moment to ask why the WTS's Culture Of Cruelty is riddled with distrust between members, money-grubbing congregants, high divorce rates, paedophillia, an expanding homosexual population, and children leaving the religion of their parents in droves.

    The WTS considers itself a "mother" organization. In a process that might be called androgynization where the genders assume characteristics of the opposite sex, heterosexual turmoil proliferates. Like the (socialist) feminists the females perpetuate an enfeebled patriarchy(matriarchy is a myth). The WTS hegemony has taken upon itself to redefine the "image" in which God created man and women. Males are feminized; masculine characteristics such as the growing of facial hair is officially discouraged and the required shaved face resembles that of the female's. Females are masculinized. Short masculine hair replaces the feminine longer. In their homes women wear the garb of men. Women are the breadwinners while the males busy themselves primping and preening for meeting parts where egos compete. Women, busy out gossipping in the car groups, dictate to their men how to cook and clean in their homes. Males are the titular heads in their families and the females dominate: Some males, instructed to squat down to urinate, grudgingly comply. Congregationally, the males play out their machismo roles after their women have determined local policy.

  • professor
    professor

    uh...we speak English here. Can you?

  • larc
    larc

    Spaz, SAY WHAT? What kind of nonsense is this anyway. I think I have read this foolishness somewhere before, but I can't remember where it was, or who wrote it. I will restrict myself to only part of your idiocy. (1) They have a two class system resembling feudalism. What nonsense. (2) Women wear the garb of men. No they don't and everyone here knows it. (3) Women are the breadwinners. Where on earth did you come up with that one? (4) Women teach the men how to cook and clean. Now, that is the most outrageous statement of all. Spaz, have you seen a good doctor lately?

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Hey Spaz,what a crock of shit.You don`t know a dam thing about dubs or WBTS.Dubland is a crazy place but nothing like what you have posted.Like larc,I have seen this posted before.Where did you copy it from? If I remember correctly,its from one of those illumniti web sites...OUTLAW

  • truman
    truman

    I really don't think I can agree with much of what you have put forth, but I do for a fact know of a witness couple in which the wife has insisted on the husband sitting down to urinate, and he has capitulated to her request/demand. I do find this highly strange, but I don't have any evidence that it is more than a personal quirk of their family. I was a witness for over 27 years and I never heard of this in any other case. My husband certainly does the typical male thing, and leaves the toilet seat up all the time to boot.

    truman

  • larc
    larc

    OUTLAW, Thank you, that is where I read it, on one of those goofy illuminati sites. What nonsense. Truman, one thing I don't understand obout women, when they are done doing their business, why can't they put the toilet seat back up, where it belongs?

  • professor
    professor

    Book Of Etiquette Rule #114:"Urinals are for standing, toilets are for sitting."

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Why can`t women put the toilet seat back up where it belongs?..LOL Hey larc,that is a question that has plagued man since toilets were invented.I think I have the answer..The women leave the toilet seat down,so you can`t see they pee`d on the bottem of it..LOL...OUTLAW

  • truman
    truman

    I know I am fighting a losing battle on this, but it is my contention that whoever cleans the toilet should get their way on the default toilet seat position. In my house, that's me. However, life is too short to fight over such things, so live and let live. The one objection I will say though is that it is extremely unpleasant to try using the toilet during the night and find yourself unsuspectingly plopping down on the cold, narrow rim of a bare toilet bowl with the seat left up by the previous user!

    truman

  • larc
    larc

    Truman, et al, If the seat is down, I aim for the center, and hope I am on target. Most of the time, I am. If not, I wipe away the spray. Oh God, I can't believe I am admitting this in public. May this thread die before my wife gets to the board tomorrow morning to read my personal and crass comments.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit