Well, I see the juice still flows. Welcome, welcome.
Hi Marilyn. I've been hoping you'd show up and throw in with us. If you read the original thread, you know we've been having a great time. And lo, the coincidence between you and I. I left the Borg in '77 as well. And I went through a period of agnosticism and, for awhile, atheism. I was in one or other of these states for about 8 years and had landed on my feet as an agnostic.
Then one moonless, clear, cold, black night on the Georgia coast in 1983, I found myself on the end of a dock on a creek in a salt marsh surrounding the island on which I lived. The sky was full of stars, and the Milky Way Galaxy was stretched across the sky. The heavens were so beautiful this night and I was as always filled with the wonder of the universe. And I thought how much I wanted to know. I wanted to know how...and when...and why...and most of all: who. So while looking up into the incredible sky that night, I issued a sort of challenge/request to the cosmos: "I don't know who you are. I don't know IF you are. I do know you're not the god of Jehovah's Witnesses, but I can't further identify you. You must be much more than has ever been conceived of here before. And I want to know you if you exist at all. If you want me to know, show yourself."
One must be careful about what one asks for.
The next few years where filled with tornadic change. As they say when the student is ready the teacher appears. And from nearly 1500 miles away one did; someone I never heard of in my life. And he served as a catalyst only; a pointer. And again for reasons I don't understand there were personal, unassisted, intuitive leaps, rocks I'd never looked under before - or even noticed - I was rolling over and under which I was searching.
Now I realize this presupposes an interventionist God, but from my perspective, that's not what happened at all. The way I explain it is that the real God, the eternal Absolute Reality, was always there ready to respond to even the smallest flicker of assent to the weak leading of even the religions of fear. He was "not far off" from me all the time. However, as I conceive it, I was standing on the human end of the human-divine hose, metaphorically speaking. When I got off the hose, the "water" began to flow, and I was sorely strained to keep up with the volume and quality of the water of life coming from the hose.
And I think that what I experienced is available to everyone, no matter their association with spiritual clubs: religions, or with no organization, or who don't "believe" in God at all, or who are not convinced there is one or not. I don't think there's anything special about me personally except that I got off my end of the hose. Anyone can do that. But this getting off the hose must be sincerely motivated. The hose can be closed by: selfishness, and all other manifiestations of the self, the ego; the chase for money; fame; position; sex; gluttony - you know, the usual stuff. But, you can cease and desist doing these things. So, as stated elsewhere, spiritual growth consists of things you give up doing, not in things that you've never done but start doing. Thus augmenting spirituality is a subtractive process. Anti-intuitive, I know, but that in its self is no bar.
I'd be happy to have a private conversation with you about this topic. You seem particularly interested, and I don't want to bore others who are not interested with it - althought they certainly can abstain from reading. I guess part of my motivation for suggesting that is that the details of this story are highly personal. Let me know.
GSX - Good to see you're here. I'm a little confused by most of your post. I understand that you object to the idea that ancient peoples were ignorant. You may have a point. But I don't think that just because a people was ancient that means they were automatically intelligent. Read the secular history of the Hebrews, you'll find it in your bible. Think about who and what you'd be talking to if you were the "speaker" of the old testament. You'd have to be speaking to a pretty ignorant, and likely gullible, suggestible, and ignorant people to be speaking like that wouldn't you? Apply that line of reasoning to Genesis and what does it tell you? The writer of Genesis was obviously speaking metaphorically, not literally, and that brings us right back to our topic: evolution. Why, if the bible writer knew about evolution at all, would he disclose that fact to a group of illiterate, primitive, savage, desert-wandering Bedouin who had no idea of microscopic life - and whose God was as primitive as they were themselves?
And the record indicates that the Hebrews had no written language until about the time of Soloman. So how were these histories passed from generation to generation? Just like they were passed on by every other culture (for most other cultures, at least) via oral histories. And you know how that works if you ever played "gossip" in the fifth grade.
I'd like to point out that we don't yet know how the pyramids were constructed, nor by whom. We've got many, many suggestions about how it could have been done. But not any verifiable data. Not yet anyway.
Was there some point you are making that I missed? Sorry if that's the case. Can you repeat it?
D8TA - You're doing us a yeoman service, sir. Thank you very much. I hope you can keep it up and be able to participate as well. The more the merrier, you know.
I'm off to the dentist. Back around two this afternoon (it's 7:30 a.m. now). Best to all,
Francois
Edited by - Francois on 9 July 2002 7:32:53