I neglected to post to this thread earlier hoping it and the absurd notions would fall to the wayside.
1. You have no clue who the actual host of a domain does other business with. As a matter of fact, the same people that host this board for Simon, may also host porn domains for other people involved in serving out porn to the net...Is this also inappropriate? Would that fact alone take away from all the good that is done here? Of course not!
2. Equating pronography with sexual abuse it spurious to say the least. It only makes one issue less clear and important, and easier for some to foist thier high and mighty morality on a subject that stretches was beyond morality. I think sexual abuse and pedophelia are universal wrongs, not moral issues.
3. Even if Hans owns porn sites, that in itself is not illegal or immoral. I will bet even money that if you ask an equal number of people who like porn and an equal number that don't (even on moral grounds), the answer in regards to pedophelia will be the same....IT IS WRONG!
4. Trying to discredit Bill will serve no purpose other than to reveal the Watchtower apollogists, thier lackeys, and make the case for finding out who and where the poedophiles in JWland are even stronger.
Some here should spend less time digging for "dirt" that is not there, worrying about the reputation of silentlambs AND more time helping Bill put an end to what has become for many, a total and utter living nightmare.
Sincerely,
District Overbeer