I got to thinking about this at work a couple of nights ago.
A news story said that the two JW's killed weren't (apparently) proselytizing in the Phillipines, which is described as a heavily Muslim nation. Though they were found with Avon products, Avon said the two were neither employees nor representatives.
Now, why would two JW's be in a heavily Muslim land, possibly pretending to be something they're not? Were they just lugging the stuff from place to place for someone as a favor?
I can come up with one answer, and any comments received should be pretty interesting: Could they have been-----------
Spies?
Now wait, don't laugh yet. At one time many of us (myself included) would have thought the idea of the WBTS "Sleeping With the Enemy" (to borrow a movie title) in the person of the UN would've been a crock, or having a stake in a company having a stake in a company doing work with possible military applications would've been impossible.
But the proof is there...it's been posted here and can be found using the search feature.
Could the WBTS find a Scriptural reason for spying? Would the incident with Rahab the harlot (actually, she was more a Benedict Arnold than a spy) in the OT be used to justify similar activity today?