MAJOR NEWS- VICKI BOER TRIAL/Canadian Press/Sep 12

by hawkaw 32 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/020912/6/owki.html

    http://www.canoe.ca/NationalTicker/CANOE-wire.Jehovah-Lawsuit.html

    Thursday September 12 5:32 PM EST

    Colleagues concealed sex abuse to protect 'clean image' of Witnesses, elder says
    By JAMES MCCARTEN

    TORONTO (CP) - Two church elders from an Ontario group of Jehovah's Witnesses were more worried about the "clean image" of their faith than they were the well-being of a young sexual abuse victim, one of their former colleagues said Thursday.

    Harald Momm was one of eight elders in the Shelburne, Ont., congregation in 1990 when he learned one of their young disciples had accused her father of sexually abusing her several years earlier. But fellow elders Steve Brown and Brian Cairns were more interested in protecting the accused, Gower Palmer, than they were the welfare of his young daughter, Momm testified.

    "They didn't want to have anything to do with the law of the land ...they wanted it kept quiet, and we didn't agree with that," he told lawyer Charles Mark.

    "This has been going on for 13 years and all I ever got out of it is: 'It is important to keep a clean image. Never mind about the victims.'"

    Brown, Cairns and the Watchtower and Bible Tract Society of Canada are among the defendants in a civil suit launched in 1998 by Vicki Boer, Palmer's daughter and herself a former Witness.

    Boer, now 31, alleges the defendants failed to allow her adequate treatment for the abuse she suffered between the ages of 11 and 14 in the family home in Shelburne, about 100 kilometres northwest of Toronto.

    Rather than immediately inform the Children's Aid Society and permit Boer to seek counselling outside the church, she was required, according to Biblical principles, to confront her father and allow him to repent his alleged sins, the suit alleges.

    During the final weeks of 1989 and early months of 1990, controversy raged within the Witness community over Boer's complaints, particularly amongst the eight elders charged with overseeing the congregation.

    Momm was one of a group of five who argued that Ontario law required them to immediately report a case of sexual abuse and allow the alleged victim to seek medical help and psychiatric counselling.

    "(Brown's) reply to me was that he didn't see it that way," Momm said.

    "I emphasized to him that we would have to do this reporting or I would do it myself. He made no comment."

    Eventually, the case was reported to Children's Aid and the police, although no charges ever ensued. Five elders, Momm among them, resigned.

    Meanwhile, Palmer - the remaining elders convinced of his spiritual repentance - rose through the ranks and enjoyed a level of privilege within the congregation normally reserved for the most respected members, said Momm.

    Boer's 58-year-old father continues to live in Shelburne and has never been criminally charged.

    During cross-examination Thursday, lawyer Colin Stevenson attacked Momm's motives for disagreeing with Cairns and Brown, suggesting the rift in the elders had been present long before the allegations surfaced.

    He also argued that Momm and his allies were confusing the spiritual law of the Witnesses, which imposes a three-year statute of limitations on such things as abuse, with the law of the land, which requires immediate reporting.

    At no time did Cairns or Brown ever directly tell Momm that they were trying to protect Palmer or that they were more concerned about the image of the church, Stevenson said.

    And he made note of the fact that Momm himself, fearful that Cairns and Brown had no plans to report the abuse, did not go to the authorities.

    "You yourself were concerned about the risks of potential prosecution for not reporting, were you not?" Stevenson asked.

    "Yes," Momm said.

    "And you yourself did not report it to the Children's Aid Society?" Stevenson continued.

    "No, and I regret it to this day," came the reply.

    John Saunders, at the time a researcher at the Watchtower's Canadian headquarters in Georgetown, Ont., told court he recommended in a memo that in cases of sexual abuse, the victim and abuser should not be made to confront each other.

    "I included a note suggesting elders not force victims of abuse to face their abusers, since these kinds of confrontations are potentially psychologically dangerous," Saunders testified.

    The recommendation was not included in a July 1988 directive from the Georgetown office advising elders to follow provincial law and notify authorities immediately in cases of sexual abuse.

    While victims of sexual abuse normally aren't identified in public, Boer has agreed to allow her name to be publicized as part of her effort to promote what she alleges is widespread abuse within the confines of the church's congregations.

    As part of their beliefs in a strict interpretation of Bible teachings, Jehovah's Witnesses reject anything political or "worldly" that distracts from their focus on Christ and the second coming, which they consider imminent.

    Birthdays, secular holidays and Christmas are not celebrated; children are often required to leave class during the Lord's Prayer and the national anthem.

    Edited by - hawkaw on 12 September 2002 21:47:11

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    This goes coast to coast in all major papers!!!!!

    hawk

  • Sam Beli
    Sam Beli

    Hawk, what was the outcome of the debate over Jim Pentons appearance?

    Thanks, btw, for your excellent coverage of this event.

    Sam

  • Quotes
    Quotes

    I only wish others could have seen the self-satisfied smirk on Glen Howe's face when witness for the Plaintiff Frank Motril (sp?) was explaining that he was bankrupt and unable to pay court ordered costs as a result of his unsuccessful attempts to sue WT and several elders in a unrelated case.

    When Defence Counsel Colin Stevenson hammered on the point that Motril had not paid the $20K, Motril shot back with something about "And I was offered to have that waived if I agreed to *NOT* participate in this trial"

    This threw all the lawyers into a tizzy, Stevenson was caught off guard, and after a brief huddle asked directly "Are you suggesting an impropriety with respect to this case?" (or something like that). The judge very quickly cut off the questioning and said (quite forcefully) "I am not interested in hearing about pre-trial settlement offers!"

    She went on to chastize Stevenson because the "entire line of questioning had nothing to do with this case". Stevenson said that it was his intent to show the witness (Motril) had a bias against the Defendants in this case because he had an outstanding costs judgement against him in another case.

    At this point the Judge ROLLED HER EYES. She was clearly not buying it!

    Honestly, although much of the trial is dry and bland, towards the end of today is getting to be like a great episode of Law & Order.

    Edited by - Quotes on 12 September 2002 21:51:43

  • Quotes
    Quotes

    Her Ladyship has reserved judgement on Penton's testimony until tomorrow (Friday).

    There was some question about whether he was to present "similar fact" testimony or "expert witness" testimony.

    I was not impressed with Plaintif Counsel Mark's arguments to allow Penton. I'm not a lawyer, but I felt like screaming my arguments as to why Penton should be allowed to testify.

  • hawkaw
    hawkaw

    "I included a note suggesting elders not force victims of abuse to face their abusers, since these kinds of confrontations are potentially psychologically dangerous," Saunders testified.

    The recommendation was not included in a July 1988 directive from the Georgetown office advising elders to follow provincial law and notify authorities immediately in cases of sexual abuse.

    Quotes - you're right

  • Nanoprobe
    Nanoprobe
    He also argued that Momm and his allies were confusing the spiritual law of the Witnesses, which imposes a three-year statute of limitations on such things as abuse, with the law of the land, which requires immediate reporting.

    Witnesses have a three year statute of limitations on SIN? I had no idea. Somebody fill me in....or is this in the SECRET ELDERS BOOK ?

  • Dia
    Dia

    Yes, that 3-year statute of limitations stuck me too. What's up with that?

    Guess that means abusers ought to seek out younger kids. Less likely to do anything about it when they're so small.

  • UnDisfellowshipped
    UnDisfellowshipped

    I've read the Chapters of Secret Elders Book on the Internet that deal with Sins and Punishment, and I never saw any 3-Year Rule.

  • ChristianObserver
    ChristianObserver
    He also argued that Momm and his allies were confusing the spiritual law of the Witnesses, which imposes a three-year statute of limitations on such things as abuse, with the law of the land, which requires immediate reporting.

    Is that in the trial transcript?????

    And what does it mean by *on such things as abuse*?

    What other *things* are included in this *statute of limitations* and where is the list published?

    Are all Witnesses aware of this *spiritual law*?

    Where do the Witnesses derive their scriptural justification for a *three-year statute of limitations*?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit