Jesus had a far more merciful way of showing compassion and justice. To the woman caught in the act he said "Go your way; from now on practice sin no more." Let the one who is sinless be first to cast a stone. And isn't disfellowshipping a form of stoning without stones? It's still ostracism. Here was a woman who was a KNOWN UNREPENTANT adultress, even Jesus knew that because he told her to practice sin NO MORE (meaning he knew her to be a practicer of sin). But Jesus didn't cast her away at all. He embraced her lovingly and showed her the way to God's open arms. There's also the story of the Prodigal Son who left his Father's house to squander his money and live a debauched life. He came to his senses later, and went home. When he got there, his Father ran to him before he even got through the gate. Now, in the JW congregation, the "father" doesn't run after you when you come home. No, you have to PROVE YOURSELF before they even welcome you back. Usually it takes a year. Instead, the JWs would rewrite the parable like this: "And when the son approached, the father first warned all the children not to associate with him. Then, with caution and seriousness, he tells his son that he must sleep in the basement until the father is convinced he's "clean" enough to be permitted access to the rest of the house. A year later, the son was allowed access to the rest of the house, but the father and the rest of the children were still suspicious of him for a while. So for several more months his father reminded him that he was spiritually weak, and still needed time before he was given any privileges in the house. In this way, my shed blood is not enough to cover his sins. He must work his way to acceptance." THAT is how the JWs behave. There is no mercy. Only a sad, institutionalized legalism. It doesn't reflect Christ's mercy, no matter how the Witnesses dress it up as "loving discipline."