From the biblical theological perspectve, there is food for thought in your post.
In the following verse, the vast majority of the translations at bible gateway show paul as admitting that he lied to the corinthians, although in the context, he denies embezzling them. Together w the other verse where he admits being an imitation, it doesn't show paul in a very good light. It also makes him look concerned about his image.
2 Corinthians 12
16Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. Yet, crafty fellow that I am, I caught you by trickery! NIV
2 Corinthians 12
16 But be that as it may, I (1) did not burden you myself; nevertheless, crafty fellow that I am, I (2) took you in by deceit. NASB
2 Corinthians 12
16But though granting that I did not burden you [with my support, some say that] I was crafty [and that] I cheated and got the better of you with my trickery.AMP
2 Corinthians 12
16Some of you admit I was not a burden to you. But they still think I was sneaky and took advantage of you by trickery. NLT
2 Corinthians 12
16 But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.KJV
2 Corinthians 12
16But granting that I myself did not burden you, I was crafty, you say, and got the better of you by deceit.ESV
2 Corinthians 12
16You agree that I wasn't a burden to you. Maybe that's because I was trying to catch you off guard and trick you. CEV
2 Corinthians 12
16But be that as it may, I did not burden you. Nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you by cunning!NKJV
2 Corinthians 12
16 But be it so, I did not burden you. Nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.KJ21
2 Corinthians 12
16 But be it so, I did not myself burden you; but, being crafty, I caught you with guile.ASV
2 Corinthians 12
16 Did I send anyone to you to get something for myself? No! WE
2 Corinthians 12
16 And be it [so], I -- I did not burden you, but being crafty, with guile I did take you;YLT
2 Corinthians 12
16 But be it so. *I* did not burden you, but being crafty I took you by guile.DARBY
I think I know what your getting at, but it sounds like "because they're claiming to be the real thing then they should in a way be Christ",
To what i was referring is the fact that the word christ means messiah. So, the word christian would mean little christ, or little messiah. If a person has the divine spirit at his core, he doesn't need an external pattern to guide him. He already has an internal one, that is now part of his being, just as the supposed jesus had. It renders moot the imitation principle. Maybe i am coming from a thought similar to what you have, maybe not. Anyway, thanks for your comments.
SS