I recently mentioned that my ex-wife Cindy had lost her father in very unpleasant circumstances. I spoke to her yesterday, and she gave me some information that I would like to share. Hopefully, I can garner some useful information here that I can pass on to her via an email link to this site.
Cindy's aged father was a devout JW. When Cindy was DF'd many years ago, he moved away to live closer to Cindy's sister Kate and husband, some one and a half hours drive away from Cindy. He lived in a warden controlled flat so's to allow him to be independant, while at the same time someone would always be close by if he needed any help at all.
About 2 weeks ago, Cindy's father collapsed and died whilst cooking. He was not found for 4 days.
Now that the funeral is over, Cindy is, very understandably, extremely angry that Berkshire County Council, who are responsible for their warden controlled apartments, did not fulfill their obligations to her father by keeping a closer eye on him. Yesterday she telephoned them, and met such a wall of indifference and carelessness that she telephoned the Daily Mail newspaper to inform them of the County Councils neglect. She reasoned that if she made an issue out of this, at least someone else could be spared the pain of what she had gone through.
The Daily Mail showed great interest in this story, and are contacting her later today for more information.
After her contact with the Daily Mail, Cindy then phoned her JW relatives to tell them of what she was doing. She met with a hostile reception, her brother in law asking her "did she really want her fathers name plastered all over the pages of a newspaper?", and advised her to drop it.
It was at this point that Cindy realised that she was "holding a hot potato" as far as JW's are concerned, and that her brother in law's objections could well have more to do with his fear of JW's being shown as being inattentive to their elderly memebers, rather than any genuine concern for the reputation of the deceased. After all, her father was a devout JW, a meeting attender and vocal supporter, so one would expect that the congregation memebers would also keep a close watch on their infirm members. The fact that his body lay undiscovered for 4 days speaks volumes for the concerns of the local congregation.
Now, so far, Cindy hasn't even mentioned the witness element to the Daily Mail, and is wondering whether she should or not when she sees them later today.
What do you think? What advice would you give to Cindy?
Englishman.