Babylon the Great and the Anti Christ (page 3)

OnTheWayOut

Perry, I almost slipped and called you Lars. I thought it was Michael Jackson also. I googled "Christian Circles" and came up with this:

Something about the Trinity.

Sorry, I don't have the patience to watch the video or decipher what you are trying to tell us about modern politics and someone's theory of prophecy. The Bible doesn't say a word about current politics. Throw enough theories out there and you may get some of them right. Predict that any government will fall and sooner or later they will.

Bonsai

I am Groot!!! We are Groot!

azor

Perry "for all my exJW friends who are not yet Christian."

So do you think we will be Christian when "Armageddon" starts. I would spit in your gods face rather than live under his genocidal tyranny. I could not live with myself on the ashes of the billions he would slaughter. Your doctrine is disgusting and worthy of shame and disgust.

Shame on you Perry!

punkofnice

Iran, armageddon(tm).......facepalm.

the trouble is I've heard it all before as a JW. Finding menace in our own shadow...stubbing our toe and finding it in bible prophecy........it all sounds SO delusional.

Perry

it all sounds SO delusional.

Punk of Nice,

Which seems more delusional?

1. That Iran, who right now operates a huge nuclear reactor will one day attack one or both of it's two greatest enemies:

2. Or, that information contained in human DNA that if printed and stacked would reach halfway to the moon, created itself from rocks bumping into each other in the ocean.

This is what the materialists on this discussion board ask us to believe and mock and ride anyone who dissents from their doctrine of delusion.

I am not saying that I believe this view presented here. It is not necessary for salvation. I post because I find it interesting; and it is gaining wider acceptance in Christian circles, such as here.

Enough.

paradisebeauty

Some say babylon the great are the christians who will not be taken at the rapture.

Viviane

Which seems more delusional?

Without reading the options, I can safely predict the answer is always "whatever Perry is for".

OnTheWayOut

Alrighty, you have gone there.

"The Bible tells us......" Those words allow ridiculously complicated theories on what symbols in the New Testament mean.

The mention of an antichrist in 1st and 2nd John seems pretty clear that the intent was to say that anyone who denies the christ is the antichrist. Should be the end of the story.

But you mix that with false messiahs and the lawless one and the beast mentioned elsewhere.

Yet, you declare that human DNA is a mix of rocks bumping into each other in the ocean.

Get your head out of your ass and see what you are doing. You are way over-complicating your beliefs and way over-simplifying those beliefs you oppose.

You are the anti-thinker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgQLyqWaCbA

punkofnice

Which seems more delusional?

Sorry, mate. that's a bifurcated question and a non sequitir to boot.

Religion is dangerous, controlling and mentally enslaving.

Who cares about how high DNA reaches? Not me, that's for sure.

I think you need time out to re-evaluate the validity of god.

johnamos

Perry…1 Corinthians 2:14, Matt 7:6

Babylon the Great and the Anti Christ

Share this